What Mathematical Tool Measures the Curvature of Space?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical tools used to measure the curvature of space, particularly in the context of general relativity and related fields. Participants explore the historical development of tensor analysis, its applications, and the relationship between mathematics and physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention that tensor analysis was developed to address limitations in previous mathematical frameworks for measuring curvature.
  • There is a reference to Christoffel symbols and their role in constructing covariant derivatives and the curvature tensor.
  • One participant questions how Einstein derived the covariant part of tensor analysis, suggesting it was not solely his invention.
  • Another participant emphasizes that Einstein utilized existing mathematical knowledge from contemporaries like Minkowski, Weyl, and Hilbert, rather than developing new mathematics himself.
  • Discussion includes the current applications of tensor analysis in fields such as general relativity, solid state physics, and crystal structure.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the term "widely used" in relation to tensor calculus, prompting further clarification on its applications.
  • String theory is introduced as a theoretical framework aimed at unifying fundamental interactions, with participants discussing its status as an incomplete theory under ongoing debate.
  • There are inquiries about the experimental search for the Higgs boson, with references to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the Tevatron, highlighting the challenges in experimental verification of theoretical predictions.
  • Participants share insights into the methods used in particle physics experiments, including the acceleration of particles and the types of targets used for collisions.
  • Humor is present in the discussion, with participants drawing analogies between particle physicists and NASCAR fans, and engaging in light-hearted banter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the historical development of tensor analysis and its applications. There is no consensus on the extent to which Einstein contributed to the mathematics involved, and the discussion on string theory remains unresolved with differing opinions on its implications and experimental verification.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various historical figures and developments in mathematics and physics, indicating a complex interplay of ideas that are not fully resolved. The discussion includes assumptions about the completeness of theories and the current state of experimental physics.

misskitty
Messages
745
Reaction score
0
When Enstein developed tensor analysis because all the other math fell apart, there was another type of math that was developed to measure the curvature of space. What is it? How does it work?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
misskitty said:
When Enstein developed tensor analysis because all the other math fell apart, there was another type of math that was developed to measure the curvature of space. What is it? How does it work?

Connection? Old name Christoffel symbols. Out of these are built the covariant derivatives and the Riemann-Christoffel tensor (now called the curvature tensor; I don't know what physicists have against old Christoffel).
 
How did he derive the covariant part? He obviously didn't make it up.
 
Einstein didn't develop anythnig into the fields of mathematics (diff.geom.to be exact).He used the knowledge acquired from his pals H.Minkowski (his ex math tech at Zürich),H.Weyl and especially D.Hilbert (there's a long story with Hilbert).

He simply postulated the equations of gravity for a free space and space with matter...
Alongside other axioms,inluding the famous Equivalence Principle.

Daniel.

P.S.The math was not "done" by 1915.Tullio Levi-Civita (1917) and Elie Cartan brought tensor calculus to a complete form.
 
Ah ok. Is this a widely used level of math?
 
It is now. In addition to general relativity (and related fields like string theory), one of the main areas where tensor math is used is in solid state physics and things like crystal structure. Every legitimate college and university that offers a degree in physics or mathematics teaches it. Tensor analysis is the calculus based big brother of maxtrix algebra which you may have encountered already.

Here is an archieved physics forum thread on tensors:
https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/t-35920_Math_"Newb"_Wants_to_know_what_a_Tensor_is.html

They are used among other things to evaluate earthquake data:

http://seismo.berkeley.edu/seismo/annual_report/ar99_00/node12.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In what sense...?"Widely used".:confused:General Relativity is one branch of physics which "widely used" tensor calculus (algebra & analysis),differential geometry to be fair.

Daniel.
 
Hmmm, sounds very complicated. This is going to sound dumb; could someone please tell me what string theory is because I don't know what it is or what it does and stuff.
 
In short,it is a theory aimed to complete the dream of theoretical physics:unifying the 4 interactions:2 long ranged:electromagnetism & gravity and 2 short ranged:weak & strong...If possible,supply a new view on cosmology.

The best model in physics (also applied to fundamental interactions) is the "pointlike particle".It's the simplest,the best and so far very successful.This "string theory" doesn't use "pointlike particles",it doesn't use particles at all,actually.It uses strings,unidimensional objects immersed into a higher dimensional space.Particles have 0 dimension,while strings have only one...

This theory,unlike the famous Standard Model of Particles and Interactions (short,SM),is not completed and is under debate and study for more than 20 years...

Daniel.
 
  • #10
Does it provide any clues about how the universe works or is it all just theory?
 
  • #11
It does.And it is just theory.Unfortunately we cannot (at this point) experimentally check its predictions.Heck,we didn't even find the Higgs boson...

Daniel.
 
  • #12
What experimentation was used to try to find Higgs boson?
 
  • #13
I'm not a specialist at this,i think someone else might tell u more about what kind of experiments will be done at CERN once they get the LHC running.

Daniel.
 
  • #14
So there hasn't been anything done yet? So theoretically Higgs' boson could exsist.
 
  • #15
Tevatron is looking. They are hoping to get something - either a mass for it or a definite no to a small mass - before LHC comes and rains on their parade.
 
  • #16
LHC? How would you go about looking for something like that?
 
  • #17
LHC=Large Hadron Collider is a collider,that is a facility in which preaccelerated particles (in this case large hadrons and even nuclei) are being crushed...

Daniel.
 
  • #18
Do they accelerate these particles and launch them at a wall to observe what happens? :bugeye:
 
  • #19
You accellerate the particles into a target often a thin sheet of gold or magnetically contained particle, which is surrounded by film or other observation technology that shows you where the bits the broke apart landed and you back track from there.
 
  • #20
Particle physicists have violent tendencies - they are the academic equivalent of NASCAR fans. They have a reputation for being especially fond of head on collisions between objects traveling in opposite directions at nearly the speed of light.
 
  • #21
Chronos said:
Particle physicists have violent tendencies - they are the academic equivalent of NASCAR fans. They have a reputation for being especially fond of head on collisions between objects traveling in opposite directions at nearly the speed of light.

I guess I ahve it twice as bad then. I like particle and the physics involved and I'm a NASCAR fan. :biggrin:

Why launch the particle at gold specifically?
 
  • #22
misskitty said:
I guess I ahve it twice as bad then. I like particle and the physics involved and I'm a NASCAR fan. :biggrin:

Why launch the particle at gold specifically?

Heh,hold on,you're on a dangerous ground here,at this rate,you might even fall in love with a physicist... :wink:

Are u referring to the famous Rutherford-Marsden-Geiger experiment...?They needed a solid,chemically pure substance,made up of one species of atoms,with a high # of electrons in the atom,so that the alpha particles would have plenty of interactions.His theory proved that significant scattering at large angles was noticed with heavier atoms...

Listen to this guy
http://www.mhhe.com/physsci/chemistry/essentialchemistry/flash/ruther14.swf

and read this guy

http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/Rutherford_Scattering/Rutherford_Scattering.html


Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K