Problem in Newtonian gravity- 2nd order, integration problems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in Newtonian gravity, specifically calculating the time it takes for a body of mass m to fall into the sun, given its initial distance r from the sun and the mass of the sun M. The focus is on integrating the equations of motion derived from gravitational forces, with an emphasis on the mathematical challenges involved in the integration process.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Romeo presents the initial equation of motion as \(\frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = \ddot{r} = \frac{GM}{r^2}\) and discusses the integration process leading to \(\dot{r} = - {\sqrt{2GM}}{\sqrt{1/r - 1/R}}\), expressing difficulty in further integration.
  • Another participant suggests that the differential equation is separable and proposes a method to integrate it, leading to a substitution that simplifies the integral.
  • The second participant calculates the integral and derives a formula for the time T as \(T=\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{GM}}(\frac{R}{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}\), providing a detailed breakdown of the integration steps involved.
  • Romeo expresses gratitude for the assistance and discusses concerns about double posting in the forum, seeking clarification on forum etiquette.
  • Other participants respond to Romeo's concerns about posting etiquette and provide suggestions for how to seek help if a thread is not receiving responses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion includes multiple perspectives on the integration process and the mathematical approach to the problem. While one participant provides a solution, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the initial integration steps presented by Romeo, nor on the appropriateness of posting practices in the forum.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the integration steps and the implications of their results. The discussion does not resolve the initial difficulties faced by Romeo in integrating the equations of motion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in gravitational physics, mathematical integration techniques, or forum etiquette may find this discussion relevant.

Romeo
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
The problem is this:

Given sun of mass M and a body of mass m (M>>m) a distance r from the sun, find the time for the body to 'fall' into the sun (initially ignoring the radius of the sun).


Our first equation is therefore [tex]\frac {d^2r}{dt^2} = \ddot{r} = \frac {GM}{r^2}[/tex].

I am able to integrate this, giving:
[tex]\dot{r} = - {\sqrt{2GM}}{\sqrt{1/r - 1/R}}[/tex],

where R is the inital distance of the body from the sun. However, I am unable to integrate this again. I have shoved it into wolfram's integrator for an indicator of what to aim for, but cannot come close.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Regards

Romeo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This diff. eq. is separable.
We may write it as:
[tex]\sqrt{\frac{r}{R-r}}\frac{dr}{dt}=-\sqrt{\frac{2GM}{R}}[/tex]
Integrating from t=0 to t=T, where T is the time when r=0, we have:
[tex]\int_{0}^{R}\sqrt{\frac{r}{R-r}}dr=\sqrt{\frac{2GM}{R}}T[/tex]

Use the substitution [tex]u=\sqrt{\frac{r}{R-r}}[/tex] to progress further:
We get: [tex]r=R\frac{u^{2}}{1+u^{2}}, \frac{dr}{du}=2R\frac{u}{(1+u^{2})^{2}}[/tex]
And [tex]r=0\to{u}=0,r=R\to{u}=\infty[/tex]

Therefore, we have:
[tex]\int_{0}^{R}\sqrt{\frac{r}{R-r}}dr=2R\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{u^{2}du}{(1+u^{2})^{2}}=R(arctan(u)-\frac{u}{1+u^{2}})\mid_{u=\infty}-R(arctan(u)-\frac{u}{1+u^{2}})|_{u=0}=\frac{\pi{R}}{2}[/tex]
That is:
[tex]T=\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{GM}}(\frac{R}{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Much appreciated Arildno and apologies if this is a little late coming. I hope my double posting was not too imposing- it would have been unnecessary had the original post in the College Homework forum taken a helpful direction.

Regards

Romeo
 
No problem.
I see from your post count that you are fairly new here, so the rule about not double posting have naturally escaped you (you're not alone in this..:wink:).

Welcome to PF, BTW.
 
Thanks Arildno. I was a little concerned about double (incidentely, it was a triple...) posting, but did so only because I thought patrons of the mathematics section may have a better insight- which seemed the case, since you very quickly responded :).

I'll keep it in mind for the future. Until then, if I have a problem that seems to be unresolved and decaying in one forum, is there any precedent for moving the thread to another forum, for fresh ideas?

Regards

Romeo
 
1. First "bump" your post (i.e, write a new reply like "Hello? Culd I have some help here, please?")

2. If that doesn't work, and it is really critical, you might consider PM'ing the moderator for the forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K