Calculating Spring Compression: Finding Height and Max Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter VSCCEGR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the height a weight will reach after being released from a compressed spring, as well as determining its maximum velocity. The problem involves concepts from energy conservation, specifically potential energy in springs and gravitational potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy principle, attempting to relate spring potential energy to gravitational potential energy. There are various attempts to set up equations, with some participants questioning the correctness of their approaches and calculations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem with multiple interpretations and approaches being discussed. Some participants have offered guidance on using conservation of energy, while others are questioning unit consistency and the setup of equations. A few participants express frustration with the pace of assistance.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding unit conversions and the representation of the spring constant. Some participants suggest that the units used may not align with standard SI units, which could affect the calculations.

VSCCEGR
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
View Thumbnail.

The setup shown is at rest. If the spring is compressed 6in. how high (h) above Equi. will the 16lb. weight reach? Max Velocity?

I'm using U_1,2=.5k(x1)^2-.5k(x2)^2 (Potential Energy)

I know it is a simple problem but there is something i am not catching. so far I have tried this:

16lb.(h+6)+[.5(15)1.06in.-.5(15)6in.]=0
1.06in=distance weight alone compresses spring
I know this is WRONG. Where am I WRONG?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of energy is your answer :

kx²/2 is the potential energy when a spring is compressed over a distance x. Then, the spring 'fires off' the object. Ofcourse this object will fly upwards but gravity will eventually stop this motion. So, the initial energy will be needed in order to 'fight' against gravity. In the conservation law, you will need to evaluate both kinetic and potential ebergy at the biginning and at the end of the motion, so you will also need to bring in gravity. Do you know the gravitational potential energy ? If so, your work is done...


marlon
 
T1+V1=T2+V2
T1=.5mv^2=.5(.497)0=0
T2=.5(.497)*?
V1=mgh=.497(32.2)0=0
V2=.497(32.2)h

This is what you are saying right?
If so what goes in the "?" spot?
If not, Why not?
 
No, you are wrong.

beginning : the spring is compressed 6 inches and the kinetic energy is ZERO

end : the object is a distance h above the equilibrium point and the kinetic energy is zero.

So you have : kx²/2 = mgh and solve this for h

marlon
 
(15lb/in.*6in)/2=16lb*h
h=16.87in
Actual answer is 45.2in

We are both missing something.
 
are the units of the spring constant Newton/meter ? because if so, you will need to convert your units into meters and kilograms...

marlon
 
He needn't,marlon,we do...:-p Units are okay fixed,so the calculations should go easily.Maybe if he translated from US to SI we'd be able to follow his #-s


Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
He needn't,marlon,we do...:-p Units are okay fixed,so the calculations should go easily.Maybe if he translated from US to SI we'd be able to follow his #-s


Daniel.

Indeed, :smile:

However, isn't the spring constant given in #/m

what the hell is this # ? :smile:

marlon
 
You guys going to help or not? :mad:
 
Last edited:
  • #10
If I'm not mistaking,they use it as pounce avoirdupoids per inch.They should use a unit for force,but they use a unit for mass.I think that's incorrect,or even dumb.

Daniel.
 
  • #11
k=2626.8N/m
x=.1524m
weight collar=71.04N
g=9.81m/s^2
 
  • #12
VSCCEGR said:
k=2626.8N/m
x=.1524m
weight collar=71.04N

Look; the solution is definitely the way i presented it to you. There must be something wrong with the units.

marlon
 
  • #13
Never Mind. I Solved It With Out You All.
 
  • #14
VSCCEGR said:
Never Mind. I Solved It With Out You All.

yeah, whatever, :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K