Solving Torque Equation: Door with Mass 20kg, 2 Hinges

  • Thread starter Thread starter BI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the torque equation for a door with a mass of 20 kg, supported by two hinges. The door dimensions are 1m wide and 2m high, with the hinges positioned 0.5m from the bottom and 0.5m from the top. The correct torque calculations yield -196 Nm for the weight of the door, 49 Nm for the bottom hinge, and 147 Nm for the top hinge, resulting in a net torque of 0 Nm, confirming static equilibrium. The pivot point is identified as the bottom hinge, and the approach to the problem is validated as correct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with torque calculations (T = F x d)
  • Knowledge of vector forces and their directions
  • Basic physics concepts related to mass and weight (e.g., gravitational force)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of static equilibrium in greater detail
  • Learn advanced torque calculations involving multiple forces
  • Explore real-world applications of torque in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the effects of hinge placement on door mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mechanics who are working on problems involving torque, static equilibrium, and force analysis in mechanical systems.

BI
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have this problem with torque and not sure if I approached it correctly or not.

A door is 1m wide and 2m high, has a mass of 20kg, and is supported by two hinges, each bearing 1/2 the weight of the door. The hinges are attached to the left of the door at locations 1/2m above the bottom edge and 1/2m below the top edge. It is in static equilbrium.

So, I write out the two conditions:
vector sum of net force= (Wdoor along -j)+(Fsupport1 along j)+(Fsupport2along j)=0
vector sum of net torque= 0
I'm stuck at this, I don't know if I wrote the equation right or not. Please help. I don't know where to put the pivot point in this example either. Is the direction for the forces right? Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your equation is correct. The pivot point in this example is the location of the hinges. For each force, you can use either a positive or negative sign depending on the direction of the force. In this case, it looks like the weight of the door is acting downwards (in the -j direction), so you can use a negative sign for that force. The forces from the two hinges will be acting in the +j direction, so you can use a positive sign for those forces.
 


Your approach to the problem is correct. The pivot point for this problem would be at the bottom hinge since it is the point where the door is rotating about.

To solve for the torque equation, you would need to consider the distance between the pivot point and each force acting on the door. In this case, the distance between the pivot point and the weight of the door would be 1m, the distance between the pivot point and the force of support from the bottom hinge would be 0.5m, and the distance between the pivot point and the force of support from the top hinge would be 1.5m.

The equation for torque is T = F x d, where T is torque, F is the force, and d is the distance between the pivot point and the force.

So for the weight of the door, the torque would be -20kg x 9.8m/s^2 x 1m = -196 Nm (negative because it is in the opposite direction of the clockwise rotation).

For the force of support from the bottom hinge, the torque would be (1/2)(20kg x 9.8m/s^2) x 0.5m = 49 Nm (positive because it is in the same direction as the clockwise rotation).

And for the force of support from the top hinge, the torque would be (1/2)(20kg x 9.8m/s^2) x 1.5m = 147 Nm (positive because it is in the same direction as the clockwise rotation).

Now, to solve for the net torque, you would add all of these torques together: -196 Nm + 49 Nm + 147 Nm = 0 Nm. This means that the net torque is 0 Nm, which is what we want since the door is in static equilibrium.

In summary, your approach to the problem is correct and the direction of the forces is also correct. Just remember to consider the distances between the pivot point and each force when solving for the torque equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K