Resolve Acceleration Due to Gravity on Slope: How Far Will the Car Travel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter recon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a car travels before coming to a stop while driving down a slope at an angle of 10 degrees. The problem involves concepts of acceleration due to gravity, deceleration, and reaction time.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the need to resolve the acceleration due to gravity along the slope and discuss the forces acting on the car. There are attempts to calculate the distance traveled during the driver's reaction time and the subsequent braking distance.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and reasoning regarding the distance traveled before stopping, while others are questioning the accuracy of the results compared to a reference answer. There is no explicit consensus on the correct distance, but various interpretations and calculations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies between their calculations and the answer provided in the textbook, leading to discussions about potential errors in reasoning or assumptions made during the problem-solving process.

recon
Messages
399
Reaction score
1
On flat ground, a driver takes 0.6 seconds to react to something signalling him to stop. When the driver hits the brakes, the car decelerates at 6 2/3 ms-2.

The driver is now driving down a long slope at 10 degrees to the horizontal. When a beam of light is flashed on him, he immediately steps on the brake (of course, he takes 0.6s to react). How long is the distance traveled before the car comes to a complete stop?



Should I resolve the acceleration due to gravity down the slope?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the first part of the question tell you ?

To find the distance in the second part you must resolve all forces along the slope (including the one due to gravity).
 
I actually had to rephrase the question as the original question was much too long. Anyway, here is my approach to the problem:

The acceleration (due to gravity) down the slope is [tex]sin 10 \times 9.81ms^{-2} = 1.703488623 ms^{-2}[/tex].

Since he takes 0.6 seconds to react, the car has increased its speed to [tex]35 ms^{-1}+ (1.7 ms^{-2} \times 0.6 s) = 36.02 ms^{-1}[/tex] and this is the speed it is traveling at the instance before he hits the brakes.

In this time, the car has traveled a distance of [tex]\frac{1}{2} \times (35ms^{-1} + 36.02ms^{-1}) \times 0.6s = 21.306m[/tex].

We now have to calculate the distance the car traverses from the time the brakes are applied to the time when the car comes to a complete stop. The negative acceleration caused by breaking is [tex]6\frac{2}{3}ms^{-2}[/tex]. Therefore the net (negative) acceleration or retardation is [tex]6\frac{2}{3}ms^{-2} - 1.703488623ms^{-2} = 4.963178044ms^{-2}[/tex].

The distance traversed from the time the brakes are applied to the time when the car comes to a complete stop is therefore =

[tex]\frac{1}{2} \times 36.02^2 \times \frac{1}{4.963178044} = 130.7066147m[/tex]

So the total distance traveled from when we start observing the car to when it comes to a complete stop is [tex]= 130.7066147m + 21.306m \approx 152m[/tex].

But the answer at the back of the book says it is 146 m, and that has made me a very unhappy person. :cry:
 
I can't find anything wrong with this, but when I tried using [itex]v_0 = 35m/s[/itex] insetad of 36.02 in the second last step, it works out to 144.7m.

Your derivation seems more correct to me though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K