View Full Version : Noncommotative structural numbers
Organic
Oct16-03, 08:43 PM
Hi,
In the attached address (at the end of the web page) there is a short paper (a pdf file) on noncommutative structural numbers:
http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/CATpage.html
I'll be glad to get your remarks.
Thank you (and special thanks to Hurkyl that gave the formal definition, which is written in the first 7 sentences of the paper).
Organic
HallsofIvy
Oct17-03, 09:16 AM
I don't see any formal definition- certainly not in the first 7 sentences. I don't actually see any definition at all. I see a lot of general vagueness and use of undefined symbols.
You say "A single-simultaneous-connection is any single real number included in p, q
( = D = Discreteness = a localized element = {.} )."
What do you mean by "included in p,q"? In particular, what do you mean by "p, q"? I would tend to assume you mean "any of [p,q], [p,q), (p,q], (p,q) which you had given above. I take it then that "A single-simultaneous connection" is a singleton set?
"Double-simultaneous-connection is a connection between any two different real numbers
included in p, q , where any connection has exactly 1 D as a common element with some
other connection ( = C = Continuum = a non-localized element = {.___.} )."
Okay, so a "double-simultaneous-connection" is a pair of numbers?
"where any connection has exactly 1 D as a common element with some other connection" is not clear. You appear to be saying that two "connections" (I take you mean "double-simultaneous-connection") that have both elements the same are not considered to be different. That's actually part of the definition of set.
I have absolutely no idea what " = C = Continuum = a non-localized element = {.___.} )" could possibly mean.
"Therefore, x is . XOR .___."
This makes no sense. The only use of "x" before this was as a bound variable in the (standard) definition of [a,b], [a,b), etc.
In any case, you have been told repeatedly that your use of "XOR" has no relation to the standard use. Please don't use a standard notation for a non-standard use.
You seem to be still agonizing over the difference between the discrete integers and the continuous real numbers. I can only suggest again that you take a good course in basic mathematical analysis. (And it might be a good idea to learn what a "definition" really is.)
By the way, what does "non-commotative" mean? Did you mean "non-commutative"? I didn't see any reference to that in you post.
Organic
Oct17-03, 10:46 AM
Hi HallsofIvy,
I wrote:
In the attached address (at the end of the web page) there is a short paper on noncommotative structural numbers:
http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/CATpage.html
First, thank you for the correction. it is noncommutative.
Please after you open the web page, go to the end of it (as I wrote above) and then open the pdf file, which is under the title:
Noncommutative structural numbers
I'll be glad to get your remarks.
By the way, please reply to my answer to you, that exists at the end of this thread:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6896&perpage=15&pagenumber=2Organic
Thank you.
HallsofIvy
Oct19-03, 04:16 PM
By the way, please reply to my answer to you, that exists at the end of this thread:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showth...number=2Organic
You have not learned anything from the replies that many people have made to your posts. I see no reason to repeat them.
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.