Solve the Puzzle: Smart Seller's Trick to Avoid Mistakes

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Puzzle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a scenario involving two sellers, A and B, who sell eggs at different rates. The focus is on identifying the mistakes made by B when he mixes and sells A's eggs while A is absent. Participants explore various mathematical and conceptual aspects of the selling strategy, including pricing, averaging, and potential losses.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that B should use A's price for all eggs to avoid losses.
  • Others question where B went wrong in his calculations and selling strategy.
  • One participant proposes that B may not have expected any reward for selling A's eggs, which could have influenced his decisions.
  • Another participant provides a mathematical breakdown of the pricing and discounts involved in the sales, highlighting the net loss incurred.
  • Some argue that if A had not left and both sold separately, they would not have incurred losses.
  • There is a discussion about B's misunderstanding of how to average prices, with some participants pointing out that B incorrectly added fractions instead of averaging them correctly.
  • One participant notes that as long as B's eggs are not sold out, there would be no issue, but once they are, losses for A would occur.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the exact nature of B's mistake and the implications of mixing the eggs. There is no consensus on a single solution or understanding of where B went wrong, as multiple interpretations and calculations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some mathematical steps and assumptions regarding pricing and sales strategies remain unresolved, leading to different interpretations of the problem. The discussion includes various hypothetical scenarios that affect the outcomes.

quark
Messages
231
Reaction score
1
Stupid Seller?

Two men A and B go to the market to sell eggs. Each one has 30 eggs. A sells 2 for one unit(insert your own monetary unit) and B sells 3 for one unit. Just before they start to sell, A gets an urgent call from his home, he requests B to sell his stuff and goes home. B, the wise man, mixes both the eggs and sells 5 for 2 units. When finally he counts the money, he gets 1 unit short(60 = 12*5 and 12*2 = 24units)

Can we suggest him the trick so that he won't repeat the mistake again?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
use the price-per-uinit of A in al the eggs, including he's.
 
My question is where did B go wrong?
 
After B sold 10 mixtures of 5 eggs each (2 from A, 3 from B), he had sold all of his own eggs. From then on, he continued to sell A's eggs at the reduced price.
 
another possibility is that B didn't expect any reward or took in interests from him selling A's eggs...
 
Why can't anybody just answer it without manipulating the story or the whole point of this disscussion? :approve:
 
Jimmy!

Correct and a big egg for you. Can you put it mathematically(in white, ofcourse)
 
----No need to "white out"
Price of A eggs= 1/2 per egg
Price of B = 1/3 per egg
New Price for AB mix 2/5 per egg
Discount on A = 1/2 – 2/5 = 5/10 -4/10 =1/10
Discount on B = 1/3 - 2/15 = 5/15 -6/15 = -1/15 “Gain”
Loss on A's = 30*(1/10)= 3
Gain on B's = 30*(1/15)= 2
Net loss = 1

Expected was 30*1/2 plus 30*1/3 total 25 not 24
Thus Should Sell 60 for 25
Or price at 5 units to buy a dozen.
 
Mathematically you are correct. But your answer doesn't show at what point of time B went wrong. Here is a lead/mislead. Suppose A didn't go home and both started selling separately. I go there to buy eggs and take two from A and three from B and I get 5 for two units and they didn't loose(1/12 = 0.083units)anything.
 
  • #10
B doesn't know how to add fractions or average (I'm assuming he wanted to average the price).
His work:
1/2 + 1/3 = 2/5

Actual work:
(1/2 + 1/3)/2 = (3/6 + 2/6)/2 = 5/6/2 = 5/12
 
  • #11
...but averaging did work in my above example.
 
  • #12
quark said:
...but averaging did work in my above example.

Yes, averaging was the way to go, but the guy in the story seemed to think adding numerators and denominators would aveage it for him.
 
  • #13
quark said:
...but averaging did work in my above example.
Sure it was a problem in your example as well,
Have the buyer keep buy'n 5 at a time and expect the same cost till he buys all the eggs.
At the end he'll need to get a $1 discount from A or pay him $1 more than his plan.
RB
 
  • #14
Randall got it right. There won't be any problem as long as B's eggs are totally not sold out(or in that proportion, atleast). Once B's thirty eggs are over then loss for A is 10*(50-40) = 1 unit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K