srp
Apr30-05, 03:34 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>In the above titled paper (Phys. Rev. 69, 87-95 (1946)), Blewett\nmentions (page 89) that despite attempts at detection in the expected\nrange, no radiation associated with the beam was detected (in 1946).\n\nHe also mentions that this may be understandable in light of Schwinger\'s\nconclusion that the power in a microwave harmonic could be estimated to\namount to only 1 part in 10^9 of the total energy radiated.\n\nI would like to know if that energy was conclusively detected since,\nconsidering the higher energies obtained since in induction\naccelerators. If so, can someone refer me to a pertaining paper.\n\nFurther on (page 94), he mentions that a discrepancy between theoretical\nestimation of radiation loss and experimental values indicates that the\nreal loss seems slightly greater than can be accounted for by radiation\nalone.\n\nIs someone aware on any follow ups on this issue and if so, a ref to a\npertaining paper would be appreciated.\n\nAndré Michaud\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>In the above titled paper (Phys. Rev. 69, 87-95 (1946)), Blewett
mentions (page 89) that despite attempts at detection in the expected
range, no radiation associated with the beam was detected (in 1946).
He also mentions that this may be understandable in light of Schwinger's
conclusion that the power in a microwave harmonic could be estimated to
amount to only 1 part in 10^9 of the total energy radiated.
I would like to know if that energy was conclusively detected since,
considering the higher energies obtained since in induction
accelerators. If so, can someone refer me to a pertaining paper.
Further on (page 94), he mentions that a discrepancy between theoretical
estimation of radiation loss and experimental values indicates that the
real loss seems slightly greater than can be accounted for by radiation
alone.
Is someone aware on any follow ups on this issue and if so, a ref to a
pertaining paper would be appreciated.
André Michaud
mentions (page 89) that despite attempts at detection in the expected
range, no radiation associated with the beam was detected (in 1946).
He also mentions that this may be understandable in light of Schwinger's
conclusion that the power in a microwave harmonic could be estimated to
amount to only 1 part in 10^9 of the total energy radiated.
I would like to know if that energy was conclusively detected since,
considering the higher energies obtained since in induction
accelerators. If so, can someone refer me to a pertaining paper.
Further on (page 94), he mentions that a discrepancy between theoretical
estimation of radiation loss and experimental values indicates that the
real loss seems slightly greater than can be accounted for by radiation
alone.
Is someone aware on any follow ups on this issue and if so, a ref to a
pertaining paper would be appreciated.
André Michaud