Understanding the Genetic Code: What is Universality and Redundancy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackdamack10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Code Genetic code
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of universality, redundancy, and non-overlapping reading frames in the context of the genetic code. Participants explore definitions, implications, and examples related to these terms, with a focus on their significance in genetics and evolutionary biology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the meaning of "universality," questioning whether it refers to a common origin of life or the consistent meaning of codons across species.
  • One participant suggests that the universality of the genetic code implies shared evolutionary developments among the three domains of life and allows for genetic information transfer between organisms.
  • Redundancy is discussed in terms of amino acids being specified by multiple codons, with participants questioning if this is the sole definition or if it extends to gene functions and duplications.
  • A participant provides an example of an open reading frame (ORF) to illustrate the concept of non-overlapping reading frames, emphasizing that shifting nucleotides alters the meaning of the sequence.
  • Another participant notes that the redundancy in the genetic code serves as a backup mechanism, allowing for multiple codon combinations to specify the same amino acid.
  • One participant introduces the idea that eukaryotic mitochondria possess a different genetic code than chromosomal DNA, suggesting a historical relationship with prokaryotic ancestors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express uncertainty and seek clarification on the definitions and implications of universality and redundancy. Multiple competing views on these concepts remain, and the discussion does not reach a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some definitions and implications of terms like universality and redundancy are not fully resolved, and there are varying interpretations of their significance in genetics and evolutionary theory.

jackdamack10
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm having problems with three terms that are used to describe the genetic code:
universality
redundancy
non-overlapping reading frame

1) Universality: For the most part, I understand. I know that the universality of the code allows for the limited exchange of genetic information among different types of organisms, and the activities of molecules such as viruses. However, I still don't get what "Universality" really is. Is it the fact that all life comes from one source?



2) Redundancy: all but two of the twenty amino acids (methionine and tryptophan) can be specified by more than one codon. Is this the only definition of redundancy?

Thank you
 
Biology news on Phys.org
jackdamack10 said:
1) Universality: For the most part, I understand. I know that the universality of the code allows for the limited exchange of genetic information among different types of organisms, and the activities of molecules such as viruses. However, I still don't get what "Universality" really is. Is it the fact that all life comes from one source?

Universality is the fact that codons have the same meaning (with a few exceptions) in virtually all species. The universality of the genetic code can be used to imply that the three domain of life shared a common evolutionnary developments. It also implies that genetic information can be transfer from one organism to another as you stated.

jackdamack10 said:
2) Redundancy: all but two of the twenty amino acids (methionine and tryptophan) can be specified by more than one codon. Is this the only definition of redundancy?

As far as the genetic code is concern, it is the only function. In broad sense in biology, more specifically genetics, redundancy can also be used in the context of gene and their functions. Sometimes genes will duplicate and therefore the newly created gene will have reduntant function. Also, 2 gene, which have a separated origin, may have the same function.

jackdamack10 said:
non-overlapping reading frame

A open reading frame (ORF) is a strech of codons, with a start and stop codon, that has the potential to encode a complete protein. Non-overlapping reading frame is basically 2 ORF that are speparated by 1 or more nucleotides.
 
An example of the ORF would be:

Imagine a good ORF that codes for a functional gene

e.g. THE BIG FAT CAT ATE RAT We can call this ORF 1 where each word is a codon

If we shift this ORF by just one nucleotide,

e.g. HEB IGF ATC ATA TER AT... The whole sequence does not make sense anymore, and will code for a nonfunctional or different gene.

So when we say that the genetic code has a non-overlapping reading frame... it means that codons must be read in one specific way (e.g. ORF 1). If read in a different way, the intended gene will not be translated into the correct protein.

The genetic code having redundancy basically means that there's always a backup plan. Also, there are different combinations of three nucleotides (codons) that can code for the same amino acid, giving extra redundancy to the genetic code.

Hope this helps a bit
 
One interesting thing about the genetic code is that eukaryotes generally have mitochondria (basically an aerobic energy producing organelle). The mitochondria have DNA that has a different genetic code then the chromosomal DNA. This may suggest that mitochondria once were single cell organisms that had a different genetic code the prokaryotic ancesters.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K