PDA

View Full Version : A theoretical physics FAQ


Arnold Neumaier
Jun21-05, 02:16 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\nA theoretical physics FAQ\n\nhttp://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physics-faq.txt\n\n\nThis site contains answers to some more or less frequently asked\nquestions from theoretical physics. They were edited from my answers\nto postings to the moderated newsgroup sci.physics.research\n(or, for some, to the unmoderated newsgroup de.sci.physik).\n\nIf you like the FAQ and/or found it useful, I\'d appreciate if you\nlink to it from your home page to make it more widely known.\n\nIf you spot errors or have suggestions for improvements,\nplease write me (at Arnold.Neumaier@univie.ac.at).\n\nIf you have questions, please post them to the moderated newsgroup\nsci.physics.research (http://www.lns.cornell.edu/spr)!\n\n\n-----------------\nTable of Contents\n-----------------\n\nS1a. What are bras and kets?\nS1b. Projective geometry and quantum mechanics\nS1c. What is the meaning of the entries of a density matrix?\nS1d. Postulates for the formal core of quantum mechanics\nS1e. Open quantum systems\nS1f. Interaction with a heat bath\nS1g. Quantum-classical correspondence\nS1h. Can all quantum states be realized in nature?\n\nS2a. Lie groups and Lie algebras\nS2b. The Galilei group as contraction of the Poincare group\nS2c. Representations of the Poincare group, spin and gauge invariance\nS2d. Forms of relativistic dynamics\nS2e. Is there a multiparticle relativistic quantum mechanics?\nS2f. Localization and position operators\n\nS3a. What are \'bare\' and \'dressed\' particles?\nS3b. How meaningful are single Feynman diagrams?\nS3c. How real are \'virtual particles\'?\nS3d. What is the meaning of \'on-shell\' and \'off-shell\'?\nS3e. Virtual particles and Coulomb interaction\nS3f. Are virtual particles and decaying particles the same?\n\nS4a. Are electrons pointlike/structureless?\nS4b. How much information is in a particle?\nS4c. How real is the wave function?\nS4d. How real are Feynman\'s paths?\nS4e. Can particles go backward in time?\nS4f. What about particles faster than light\n\nS5a. QM pictures and representations\nS5b. Inequivalent representations of the CCR/CAR\nS5c. Why does QFT look so different from QM?\nS5d. Why is QFT based on a classical action?\nS5e. Why does the action only contain first derivatives?\nS5f. Why normal ordering?\nS5g. Why locality and causal commutation relations?\nS5h. Creation operators and rigged Hilbert space\n\nS6a. Nonperturbative computations in QFT\nS6b. The formal functional integral approach to QFT\nS6c. Functional integrals, Wightman functions, and rigorous QFT\nS6d. Is there a rigorous interacting QFT in 4 dimensions?\nS6e. The classical limit of relativistic QFT\nS6f. What are interpolating fields?\n\nS7a. What is the mass gap?\nS7b. Why can a bound state of massless quarks be heavy?\nS7c. Bound states in relativistic QFT\n\nS8a. Why renormalization?\nS8b. Renormalization without infinities I\nS8c. Renormalization without infinities II\nS8d. Renormalization and coarse graining\nS8e. Renormalization scale and experimental energy scale\nS8f. Dimensional regularization\nS8g. Nonrelativistic quantum field theory\nS8h. Nonrenormalizable theories as effective theories\nS8i. What about infrared divergences?\n\nS9a. Summing divergent series\nS9b. Is QED consistent?\nS9c. What about relativistic QFT at finite times?\nS9d. Perturbation theory and instantaneous forces\nS9e. QED and relativistic quantum chemistry\n\nS10a. How are matrices and tensors related?\nS10b. Is quantum mechanics compatible with general relativity?\nS10c. Difficulties in quantizing gravity\nS10d. Renormalization in quantum gravity\nS10e. Hadamard states and their Hilbert spaces\nS10f. Why do gravitons have spin 2?\nS10g. What is the tetrad formalism?\nS10h. Energy in general relativity\nS10i. What happened to the ether?\nS10j. What is time?\n\nS11a. A concise formulation of the measurement problem of QM\nS11b. The double slit experiment\nS11c. The Stern-Gerlach experiment\nS11d. The minimal interpretation\nS11e. The preferred basis problem\nS11f. Master equation and pointer variables\nS11g. Does decoherence solve the measurement problem?\n\nS12a. Which interpretation of quantum mechanics is most consistent?\nS12b. Which textbook of quantum mechanics is best for foundations?\nS12c. What is the role of quantum logic?\nS12d. Stochastic quantum mechanics\nS12e. Is there a relativistic measurement theory?\n\nS13a. Random numbers and other random objects\nS13b. What is the meaning of probabilities?\nS13c. What about the subjective interpretation of probabilities?\nS13d. Are probabilities limits of relative frequencies?\nS13e. How meaningful are probabilities of single events?\nS13f. How probable are realizations of stochastic processes?\nS13g. How do probabilities apply in practice?\nS13h. Incomplete knowledge and statistics\nS13i. Priors and entropy in probability theory\n\nS14a. Theoretical challenges close to experimental data\nS14b. Does the standard model predict chemistry?\nS14c. Is the result of a measurement a real number?\nS14d. Why use complex numbers in physics?\n\nS15a. How precise can physical language be?\nS15b. Why bother about rigor in physics?\nS15c. Justifying the foundations of a theory\nS15d. Foundations, theory and experiment\n\nS16a. On progress in science\nS16b. How different are physical sciences and social sciences\nS16c. Can good theories be falsified?\nS16d. What, then, distinguishes a good theory?\nS16e. When is a theory preferred to another one?\nS16f. What is a fact?\nS16g. Physics and experience\n\nS17a. How to get information from sci.physics.research\nS17b. How to get your work published\nS17c. How to sell your revolutionary idea\nS17d. Useful background for theoretical physics\nS17e. Stories about physicists\nS17f. Other physics FAQs\n\nS18a. What is the meaning of \'self-consistent\'?\nS18b. What is a vector?\nS18c. Learning quantum mechanics at age 14\n\nS19a. Acknowledgments\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">&nbsp;&nbsp;View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>A theoretical physics FAQ

http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physics-faq.txt


This site contains answers to some more or less frequently asked
questions from theoretical physics. They were edited from my answers
to postings to the moderated newsgroup sci.physics.research
(or, for some, to the unmoderated newsgroup de.sci.physik).

If you like the FAQ and/or found it useful, I'd appreciate if you
link to it from your home page to make it more widely known.

If you spot errors or have suggestions for improvements,
please write me (at Arnold.Neumaier@univie.ac.at).

If you have questions, please post them to the moderated newsgroup
sci.physics.research (http://www.lns.cornell.edu/spr)!


-----------------
Table of Contents
-----------------

S1a. What are bras and kets?
S1b. Projective geometry and quantum mechanics
S1c. What is the meaning of the entries of a density matrix?
S1d. Postulates for the formal core of quantum mechanics
S1e. Open quantum systems
S1f. Interaction with a heat bath
S1g. Quantum-classical correspondence
S1h. Can all quantum states be realized in nature?

S2a. Lie groups and Lie algebras
S2b. The Galilei group as contraction of the Poincare group
S2c. Representations of the Poincare group, spin and gauge invariance
S2d. Forms of relativistic dynamics
S2e. Is there a multiparticle relativistic quantum mechanics?
S2f. Localization and position operators

S3a. What are 'bare' and 'dressed' particles?
S3b. How meaningful are single Feynman diagrams?
S3c. How real are 'virtual particles'?
S3d. What is the meaning of 'on-shell' and 'off-shell'?
S3e. Virtual particles and Coulomb interaction
S3f. Are virtual particles and decaying particles the same?

S4a. Are electrons pointlike/structureless?
S4b. How much information is in a particle?
S4c. How real is the wave function?
S4d. How real are Feynman's paths?
S4e. Can particles go backward in time?
S4f. What about particles faster than light

S5a. QM pictures and representations
S5b. Inequivalent representations of the CCR/CAR
S5c. Why does QFT look so different from QM?
S5d. Why is QFT based on a classical action?
S5e. Why does the action only contain first derivatives?
S5f. Why normal ordering?
S5g. Why locality and causal commutation relations?
S5h. Creation operators and rigged Hilbert space

S6a. Nonperturbative computations in QFT
S6b. The formal functional integral approach to QFT
S6c. Functional integrals, Wightman functions, and rigorous QFT
S6d. Is there a rigorous interacting QFT in 4 dimensions?
S6e. The classical limit of relativistic QFT
S6f. What are interpolating fields?

S7a. What is the mass gap?
S7b. Why can a bound state of massless quarks be heavy?
S7c. Bound states in relativistic QFT

S8a. Why renormalization?
S8b. Renormalization without infinities I
S8c. Renormalization without infinities II
S8d. Renormalization and coarse graining
S8e. Renormalization scale and experimental energy scale
S8f. Dimensional regularization
S8g. Nonrelativistic quantum field theory
S8h. Nonrenormalizable theories as effective theories
S8i. What about infrared divergences?

S9a. Summing divergent series
S9b. Is QED consistent?
S9c. What about relativistic QFT at finite times?
S9d. Perturbation theory and instantaneous forces
S9e. QED and relativistic quantum chemistry

S10a. How are matrices and tensors related?
S10b. Is quantum mechanics compatible with general relativity?
S10c. Difficulties in quantizing gravity
S10d. Renormalization in quantum gravity
S10e. Hadamard states and their Hilbert spaces
S10f. Why do gravitons have spin 2?
S10g. What is the tetrad formalism?
S10h. Energy in general relativity
S10i. What happened to the ether?
S10j. What is time?

S11a. A concise formulation of the measurement problem of QM
S11b. The double slit experiment
S11c. The Stern-Gerlach experiment
S11d. The minimal interpretation
S11e. The preferred basis problem
S11f. Master equation and pointer variables
S11g. Does decoherence solve the measurement problem?

S12a. Which interpretation of quantum mechanics is most consistent?
S12b. Which textbook of quantum mechanics is best for foundations?
S12c. What is the role of quantum logic?
S12d. Stochastic quantum mechanics
S12e. Is there a relativistic measurement theory?

S13a. Random numbers and other random objects
S13b. What is the meaning of probabilities?
S13c. What about the subjective interpretation of probabilities?
S13d. Are probabilities limits of relative frequencies?
S13e. How meaningful are probabilities of single events?
S13f. How probable are realizations of stochastic processes?
S13g. How do probabilities apply in practice?
S13h. Incomplete knowledge and statistics
S13i. Priors and entropy in probability theory

S14a. Theoretical challenges close to experimental data
S14b. Does the standard model predict chemistry?
S14c. Is the result of a measurement a real number?
S14d. Why use complex numbers in physics?

S15a. How precise can physical language be?
S15b. Why bother about rigor in physics?
S15c. Justifying the foundations of a theory
S15d. Foundations, theory and experiment

S16a. On progress in science
S16b. How different are physical sciences and social sciences
S16c. Can good theories be falsified?
S16d. What, then, distinguishes a good theory?
S16e. When is a theory preferred to another one?
S16f. What is a fact?
S16g. Physics and experience

S17a. How to get information from sci.physics.research
S17b. How to get your work published
S17c. How to sell your revolutionary idea
S17d. Useful background for theoretical physics
S17e. Stories about physicists
S17f. Other physics FAQs

S18a. What is the meaning of 'self-consistent'?
S18b. What is a vector?
S18c. Learning quantum mechanics at age 14

S19a. Acknowledgments

Igor Khavkine
Jun21-05, 08:00 PM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>Arnold Neumaier wrote:\n&gt; A theoretical physics FAQ\n&gt;\n&gt; http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physics-faq.txt\n&gt;\n&gt;\n&gt; This site contains answers to some more or less frequently asked\n&gt; questions from theoretical physics. They were edited from my answers\n&gt; to postings to the moderated newsgroup sci.physics.research\n&gt; (or, for some, to the unmoderated newsgroup de.sci.physik).\n\nThanks for maintaining this great resource and keeping us appraised of\nits updates. However, the FAQ has grown quite large and it\'s hard to\ntell what has changed since the last update. Can you provide a summary\nof changes since the last version?\n\nThanks.\n\nIgor\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">&nbsp;&nbsp;View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>Arnold Neumaier wrote:
> A theoretical physics FAQ
>
> http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physics-faq.txt
>
>
> This site contains answers to some more or less frequently asked
> questions from theoretical physics. They were edited from my answers
> to postings to the moderated newsgroup sci.physics.research
> (or, for some, to the unmoderated newsgroup de.sci.physik).

Thanks for maintaining this great resource and keeping us appraised of
its updates. However, the FAQ has grown quite large and it's hard to
tell what has changed since the last update. Can you provide a summary
of changes since the last version?

Thanks.

Igor

Arnold Neumaier
Jun22-05, 07:30 PM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>Igor Khavkine wrote:\n\n&gt; Arnold Neumaier wrote:\n&gt;\n&gt;&gt;A theoretical physics FAQ\n&gt;&gt;\n&gt;&gt; http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physics-faq.txt\n&gt;&gt;\n&gt;&gt;This site contains answers to some more or less frequently asked\n&gt;&gt;questions from theoretical physics. They were edited from my answers\n&gt;&gt;to postings to the moderated newsgroup sci.physics.research\n&gt;&gt;(or, for some, to the unmoderated newsgroup de.sci.physik).\n&gt;\n&gt; Thanks for maintaining this great resource and keeping us appraised of\n&gt; its updates. However, the FAQ has grown quite large and it\'s hard to\n&gt; tell what has changed since the last update. Can you provide a summary\n&gt; of changes since the last version?\n\nI haven\'t kept old versions, so I can\'t tell - the FAQ is continuously\nupdated as I learn more (or write more down of what I know already)\nthrough the newsgroup discussions. I announce in the newsgroup not\nevery change but only the state every now and then when I regroup\nthe entries to make the FAQ better structured.\n\nTypically, entries already present change only in little details\nthat I learnt later. For example, if you followed my contributions on\nrenormalization, you know all that is in the FAQ, although there it is\noften a little more polished.\n\nSo the entries you\'d read are the ones that haven\'t been there last\ntime. The previous list of entries can be found theough a search in\nhttp://groups-beta.google.com/\n\nOr simply read what looks interesting. Rereading something you read\nalready may still be interesting; at different times one picks up\ndifferent things.\n\n\nArnold Neumaier\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">&nbsp;&nbsp;View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>Igor Khavkine wrote:

> Arnold Neumaier wrote:
>
>>A theoretical physics FAQ
>>
>> http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physics-faq.txt
>>
>>This site contains answers to some more or less frequently asked
>>questions from theoretical physics. They were edited from my answers
>>to postings to the moderated newsgroup sci.physics.research
>>(or, for some, to the unmoderated newsgroup de.sci.physik).
>
> Thanks for maintaining this great resource and keeping us appraised of
> its updates. However, the FAQ has grown quite large and it's hard to
> tell what has changed since the last update. Can you provide a summary
> of changes since the last version?

I haven't kept old versions, so I can't tell - the FAQ is continuously
updated as I learn more (or write more down of what I know already)
through the newsgroup discussions. I announce in the newsgroup not
every change but only the state every now and then when I regroup
the entries to make the FAQ better structured.

Typically, entries already present change only in little details
that I learnt later. For example, if you followed my contributions on
renormalization, you know all that is in the FAQ, although there it is
often a little more polished.

So the entries you'd read are the ones that haven't been there last
time. The previous list of entries can be found theough a search in
http://groups-\beta.google.com/

Or simply read what looks interesting. Rereading something you read
already may still be interesting; at different times one picks up
different things.


Arnold Neumaier