What system does this lagrangian represent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a Lagrangian given by L = m/2(aX^2 + bXY + cY^2) - K/2(ax^2 + bxy + cy^2), where the variables represent generalized coordinates and their derivatives. Participants are exploring the physical system that this Lagrangian might represent, with a focus on its implications for coupled oscillators and the significance of the velocity term.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the Lagrangian and its representation of a physical system, questioning the relevance of the velocity term. There is mention of transforming to different generalized coordinates to simplify the expression. Some participants suggest examining the Lagrangian in terms of a symmetric matrix to find normal modes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the transformation of coordinates and the implications for understanding the system. There is no explicit consensus on the physical interpretation, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note specific cases to consider for deriving equations of motion, indicating a structured approach to the problem. There is mention of potential confusion regarding the notation used in the Lagrangian.

Jamoo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I am struggling with this tutorial problem: If you have the following lagrangian:

L = m/2(aX^2 + bXY + cY^2) - K/2(ax^2 + bxy + cy^2)

(Where captial letters indicate first derivative with respect to time, a,b,c constants)

What physical system does it represent?

It looks like a simple coupled oscillator, but I don't know what the extra velocity term (bXY) could represent? Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it matter what physical system it represents? What does the question ask?

It's really hard to work back to from the Lagrangian to a particular system, anyway, since the coordinates can be generalised coordinates rather than simple displacements, for example.

It would be possible to transform to different generalised coordinates (U,V) which would completely remove the XY terms in the expression, and give an equivalent Lagrangian with no terms of the form kUV.

For example, try:

U = X + Y
V = X - Y
 
The question is as follows:
1) Derive the Equations of motion for this sytem

Examine particularly cases a=c=0, and b=0,c=-a (I am not sure whther this applies to part 1 or 2/3)

2) What is the physical system described by the above Lagrangian
3) Write the natural form of the Lagrangian for this system

But thanks for the help so far.
 
Last edited:
You can probably write each term in terms of a symmetric matrix. Finding the eigenvectors and eigenvalues (i.e., "normal modes") should suggest a nicer choice of coordinates.
 
for the first term, do you mean X or X dot?

do you mean [itex]\frac {m}{2} (a\dot{x}^2 . . ..[/itex] ?
 
JamesR and robphy, thanks. Using normal coordiantes seems to be the way to go.

sniffer: yes, by X I meant x dot, I just haven't worked out how to use the equation editor on forum.
 
sorry, i didn't read carefully.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K