Simple Harmonic Problem: Finding Time at x=-0.05m with Mass on Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics noob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a simple harmonic motion problem involving a mass-spring system. The original poster seeks to determine the time at which a mass attached to a spring is at a specific position, x = -0.05m, after being displaced from equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the equation x = A cos(ωt) and the calculation of angular frequency (ω) from the spring constant and mass. There are attempts to derive relationships and clarify the distinction between angular frequency and angular velocity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on deriving ω and emphasized that it is independent of the energy given to the system. There is ongoing exploration of different methods to find the correct time, with some expressing confusion about the relationship between velocity, angular frequency, and the nature of simple harmonic motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the professor did not cover certain equations, leading to questions about their derivation. There is also mention of confusion regarding the relationship between simple harmonic motion and circular motion, particularly concerning the constancy of angular frequency versus changing linear velocity.

physics noob
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
yet another "simple" harmonic problem

1.01kg mass is attached to a horizontal massless spring with k=10N/m The system is set into motion by pulling the mass .2m away from equilibrium, releasing it from rest.

find a time when the mass is at x= -.05m

so i used x=Acos(omega *t)

so to get omega i used MEi = MEf
getting .5(10)(.2)^2 = .5(10)(.05)^2 + .5(1.01)v^2

I am gettin a velocity of .61 which is an angular velocity of

3.05 rad/s i plug it into the aforemention equation

so .05=.20cos(3.05(t)) t = .43 sec which of course is wrong correct answer is .58

where did i go wrong here,,,,, also i have tried several combinations starting Xo at different spots. but i can't seem to get the right answer.......any help is appriciated...THANKS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a simple plug in the formula...

[tex]\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]

[tex]A = 0.2 m[/tex]

[tex]x = A \cos (\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} t)[/tex]

Simply solve for t.
 
hmmm. it would have been an easy plug in the answers if i had known that

omega = sqroot of k/m is this commonly known? because my professor never went over that equation... can you derive it?
 
sorry to be a bother, but furhermore I am not getting .58 I am gettin nearer .42
 
Yes i can derive it.

Now let's study the simple harmonic motion of a spring-mass system, by using Newton's 2nd Law in scalar form:

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^{n} F_{i} = ma[/tex]

There's a restorative force spring force

[tex]-kx = ma[/tex]

which is a 2nd order ODE

[tex]\frac{k}{m}x + \ddot{x} = 0[/tex]

Looking at the standard Simple Harmonic motion equation

[tex]\omega^{2} x + \ddot{x} = 0[/tex]

we get

[tex]\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]

Remember to put your calculator in radians.
 
Last edited:
youre the man...thanks a million!
 
The angular velocity (more appropriately called angular frequency in this problem) has nothing to do with how much energy you give the system. It depends on mass and spring constant. Find the appropriate relationship and calculate it.

Don't forget the minus sign when you go to solve for the time.
 
Last edited:
physics noob said:
PS i posted this yesterday, and despite some helpful responses i have yet to obtain the correct answer
Please do not start a second thread with the same problem! I merged OlderDan's post into this existing thread.
 
The angular velocity (more appropriately called angular frequency in this problem) has nothing to do with how much energy you give the system.




yes but velocity does, which i then used to find angular velocity, which i then used to find time...i don't see how else i can solve this problem
 
  • #10
physics noob said:
1.01kg mass is attached to a horizontal massless spring with k=10N/m The system is set into motion by pulling the mass .2m away from equilibrium, releasing it from rest.

find a time when the mass is at x= -.05m

so i used x=Acos(omega *t)
That will work. First find omega from the mass and spring constant. You have x and A.

As OlderDan says, omega has nothing to do with the energy given to the system, so no need for conservation of energy.
 
  • #11
physics noob said:
I am gettin a velocity of .61 which is an angular velocity of

3.05 rad/s
You are confusing simple harmonic motion, which has an angular frequency, with circular motion which has an angular speed. [itex]v = \omega r[/itex] is not relevant here.
 
  • #12
ok i just got the right answer...by finding omega using f= omega/2pi

ok but now i have a couple of questions,,,,,, couldn't i find omega by finding the velocity when the PE of the spring is .05...by using MEi=MEf...then when i have velocity i can convert it to angular velocity by dividing by .2 which is the radius...and then put that into x=Acos(omegaT) and when i found omega using the above equation, doesn't that imply that omega is constant, meaning what would be the difference in omega at distance x=.18 doesn't velocity change through out the harmonic motion,,,,,,and if that's true angular velocity changes as well, because omega and V differ by either dividing or multiplying a constant R.

i guess I am most confused on how omega is constant through out this process of harmonic motion , when acceleration and velocity are constantly changing.

oh thanks are in order for all of you who helped//////thanks again
 
  • #13
Doc Al said:
You are confusing simple harmonic motion, which has an angular frequency, with circular motion which has an angular speed. [itex]v = \omega r[/itex] is not relevant here.


wait, I am pretty sure my professor said that's exactly what you can relate it too,,,, it has the same movement and velocity as circular motion
 
  • #14
physics noob said:
ok but now i have a couple of questions,,,,,, couldn't i find omega by finding the velocity when the PE of the spring is .05...by using MEi=MEf...then when i have velocity i can convert it to angular velocity by dividing by .2 which is the radius...and then put that into x=Acos(omegaT)
No. As I said earlier, do not confuse uniform circular motion (where [itex]v = \omega r[/itex]) with simple harmonic motion.
and when i found omega using the above equation, doesn't that imply that omega is constant, meaning what would be the difference in omega at distance x=.18
Omega is constant!
doesnt velocity change through out the harmonic motion,,,,,,and if that's true angular velocity changes as well, because omega and V differ by either dividing or multiplying a constant R.
Linear speed does change, but the angular frequency does not.

i guess I am most confused on how omega is constant through out this process of harmonic motion , when acceleration and velocity are constantly changing.
You can relate uniform circular motion to SHM like this: Imagine something moving in a circle at a uniform angular rate [itex]\omega[/itex]. The x-component of that circular motion executes SHM (described by [itex]A\cos \omega t[/itex]). The speed of that x-component varies from 0 to a maximum of [itex]A \omega[/itex], but [itex]\omega[/itex] remains constant.
 
  • #15
ahhh, i see now,,,, cause in the circular motion only the x velocity is pertantent to SHM...thanks a million doc,,,, you run a great place here!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K