The origin of cold dark matter halo density profiles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the two-phase accretion model of cold dark matter (CDM) halo density profiles, as detailed in the paper "The origin of cold dark matter halo density profiles." N-body simulations reveal that the first phase involves rapid accretion through major mergers, resulting in an inner density profile of $\rho(r) \propto r^{-1}$. The second phase is characterized by slow mass addition to the outer halo, leading to an outer profile of $\rho(r) \propto r^{-3}$. This model aligns with cosmological N-body simulations and provides insights into the universality of dark matter halo profiles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of N-body simulations in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with cold dark matter (CDM) theories
  • Knowledge of density profile functions, specifically NFW (Navarro-Frenk-White) profile
  • Basic concepts of hierarchical mass assembly in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) density profile and its implications for dark matter
  • Explore the role of mass accretion histories in cosmological simulations
  • Study the effects of violent relaxation on CDM halo structures
  • Investigate laboratory searches for cold dark matter and its potential properties
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and astrophysicists interested in dark matter research, particularly those focusing on halo formation and structure in the universe.

Garth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,580
Reaction score
107
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0508624

N-body simulations predict that CDM halo-assembly occurs in two phases: 1) a rapid accretion phase dominated by major mergers with a rapidly deepening potential well; and 2) a slow accretion phase characterised by a gentle addition of mass to the outer halo with little change in the inner potential well. We demonstrate, using one-dimensional simulations, that this two-phase accretion leads to CDM halos of the NFW form and provides physical insight into the properties of the mass accretion history that influence the final profile. During the fast accretion phase fluctuations in the gravitational potential effectively isotropise the velocities of CDM particles and we show that this leads to an inner profile $\rho(r)\propto r^{-1}$. Slow accretion onto an established potential well leads to an outer profile with $\rho(r)\propto r^{-3}$. The concentration of a halo is determined by the fraction of mass that is accreted during the fast accretion phase. Using an ensemble of realistic mass accretion histories, we show that the model predictions of the dependence of halo concentration on halo formation time, and hence the dependence of halo concentration on halo mass, and the distribution of halo concentrations all match those found in cosmological N-body simulations. Using a simple analytic model that captures much of the important physics we show that the inner $r^{-1}$ profile of CDM halos is a natural result of hierarchical mass assembly with a initial phase of rapid accretion. Our results also suggest that violent relaxation plays a minor role in structuring CDM halos.
This paper offers a fairly natural explanation for the universality of dark matter halo profiles.

In this model the mass accretion history has two distict phases, first a fast phase dominated by frequent mergers of smaller condensations of CDM, followed by a slow phase where mass slowly accretes onto the outer boundary of an existing central object. This model with only 2 phases accurately reproduces the properties of the CDM halo population, which, if correct, would imply that this is the key to explaining the universal nature of such haloes.

The continued effort modelling the large and smaller scale structure in the universe bears fruit and leads to confidence in the LCDM paradigm.

However where is the CDM? If and when it is discovered in the laboratory what properties will it have? Will these as-yet-undiscovered properties match the requirement of non-interacting CDM models such as the one here? We will have to wait and see.

Garth
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yeah, this paper is consistent with a lot of the ideas I've seen thrown around at conferences. By no means am I willing to blindly accept these ideas (this process is extremely difficult to model in the accretion phase), but it's nice to see that there is progress. By the way, your link is to the wrong abstract:

http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0508624
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K