How is this proof valid? ax(bxc) = (c.a)b-(b.a)c

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of the proof for the vector triple product, specifically the expression ax(bxc) = (c.a)b - (b.a)c. The user initially struggles with matching terms in their proof, particularly the discrepancy between a1b1c3 and a1b3c1. Ultimately, the issue is resolved when the user realizes they omitted a term in the ax(bxc) calculation, confirming the proof's correctness. This highlights the importance of meticulousness in mathematical proofs involving vector notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the vector triple product
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic manipulation
  • Experience with mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the vector triple product in detail
  • Learn about vector notation and its importance in proofs
  • Practice algebraic manipulation of vector expressions
  • Explore common pitfalls in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone involved in vector calculus or linear algebra who seeks to deepen their understanding of vector operations and proof techniques.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, I'm looking at this proof and its making sense until the very last part, and it doens't friggin' work...the terms don't match up... Also is the notation I used correct in the proof, like does there have to be any vector notation I don't have or do you see anyhting you don't like? I'm proving the "The Vector triple product"
Here is my proof:
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/9758/rpooof6rk.jpg
Look at the 2nd part of ax(bxc) -----> a1b1c3 - a2b22c3 + a2b3c2
then look at the last part (c.ad)b - (b.a)c ---> a1b3c1 - a1b1c3 + a2b3c2 - a2b2c3

You see only 1 term isn't match up! the a1b1c3 not equal to a1b3c1 what's going on? Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, my friend found the problem! I forgot a term in ax(bxc) part.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K