Find Limit: <Undefined,Undefined,6/5>

  • Thread starter Thread starter Whatupdoc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the limit as t approaches 0 for three expressions: \(\frac{e^{-5t} - 1}{t}\), \(\frac{t^{13}}{t^{14}-t^{13}}\), and \(\frac{6}{5+t}\). Participants are exploring the behavior of these expressions at the limit point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest using l'Hopital's rule for the first term and rewriting the second term to simplify the expression. Others discuss the distinction between "undefined" and "undetermined" limits, questioning the assumptions made when substituting values directly.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the limits. There is acknowledgment of the need for deeper analysis of the first two components, and some guidance has been offered regarding the application of l'Hopital's rule and factoring techniques for simplification.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that both the first two components yield "0/0" forms, prompting further investigation into their limits. The distinction between different types of indeterminate forms is also under consideration.

Whatupdoc
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Find the limit:

lim, t->0 [tex]< \frac{e^{-5t} - 1}{t}, \frac{t^{13}}{t^{14}-t^{13}}, \frac{6}{5+t}>[/tex]

answer: <__,__,__>

well, what i did is just plug in zero for t which i get <0,0, 6/5> which is incorrect. am i missing something? or actually it should be <undefined,undefined, 6/5>
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first term, try l'Hopital's rule. For the second term, see if you can write the expression using only [tex]t^{13}[/tex] and lower powers of t (splitting the denominator into two multiplicative terms would help a lot), and the third term of course doesn't pose a problem.
 
Whatupdoc said:
Find the limit:

lim, t->0 [tex]< \frac{e^{-5t} - 1}{t}, \frac{t^{13}}{t^{14}-t^{13}}, \frac{6}{5+t}>[/tex]

answer: <__,__,__>

well, what i did is just plug in zero for t which i get <0,0, 6/5> which is incorrect. am i missing something? or actually it should be <undefined,undefined, 6/5>

Well, first, as I think you understand, "plugging" in 0 does not give 0 for the first two! Neither does it give "undefined"- the limit may exist even if the value does not.

Some texts make a distinction between "a/0" when a is not 0 and "0/0". Of course, neither is a number but we often refer to "0/0" as "undetermined" rather than "undefined". "a/0" is undefined because if we try to set x= a/0 we get x*0= a which is not true for any x. If set x= 0/0, however, we get x*0= 0 which is true for all x. We still can't give a specific value for x so it is "undetermined".

This is important here because: if f(x)-> a, a nonzero number, and g(x)->0, then f(x)/g(x) must get larger and larger- there is no limit, the limit is "undefined".

If f(x)->0 and g(x)->0 also, then f(x)/g(x) may have a limit. For an obvious example, take f(x)= x and g(x)= x. As x-> 0, both of those go to 0 but their quotient is x/x= 1 (as long as x is not 0) which has limit 1 as x goes to 0.

For your example, both the first two components become "0/0" (all interesting limits do!) so you need to look more closely. You could, as Brinx suggested, use L'Hopital's rule but that is not necessary.

The second component is a little simpler than the first:
[tex]\frac{t^{13}}{t^{14}-t^{13}}[/tex]
That is one polynomial divided by another. The fact that t=0 make both of them 0 means that we can factor t out of both! In fact, t14-t13= t13(t- 1). Now, you can cancel and be left with [tex]\frac{1}{t-1}[/tex]. What is the limit of that as t goes to 0?

The first is a little subtler.
Do you know that the derivative of e-5t is -5 e-5t and so the derivative at t=0 is -5?
Do you recognize that first component as being exactly the "difference quotient" you would use in the basic definition (replacing t with "h" perhaps) to find the derivative of e-5t at t= 0?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ahhh, i forgot all about the L'hopital rule. thanks a lot for the long explanation, i totally get it now
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K