Proof of the equality of men through induction.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicist7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of proving the statement "All men are created equal" using mathematical induction. Participants are exploring the intersection of philosophical concepts and mathematical reasoning, particularly in the context of a first-year calculus course.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the proof and seeks guidance on the approach. Some participants attempt to formulate a proof using induction, while others question the appropriateness of applying mathematical methods to a philosophical statement.

Discussion Status

There are various attempts to engage with the problem, with one participant providing a structured induction attempt. However, there is also skepticism regarding the validity of the approach, as some participants highlight the philosophical nature of the statement and question the implications of the induction method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges of transitioning from high school mathematics to university-level analysis, indicating a struggle with the course material and the nature of the problem being discussed.

Physicist7
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I was wondering is it possible to prove the statement , that "All men are created equal" through the proof method of induction. If so how?, if not, why? I just don't know where to begin. This course is a killer. I am attending the Univeristy of Toronto for my first year and the math is very different then high school, and the first year Calc course is actually called Analysis I where we use Michael Spivaks book. It is different and so I am struggling but I don't want to give up! Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically how would I approach this problem?
 
Nothing eh?
 
I'll give it a try...

Statement: S(n) = The man n is created equal to man n-1 and the man 0 is created equal to man 0.

Basis: S(0) = The man 0 is created equal to man 0. Correct.
S(1) = The man 1 is created equal to man 0. Correct.

Induction: S(n+1) = S(n)
The man n+1 is created equal to man n. = The man n is created equal to man n-1.
The man n+1 is created equal to man n. = The man n-1 is created equal to man n.
The man (n+1+n-1) is created equal to man (n+n).
The man 2n is created equal to man 2n. Correct.

I don't think that is totally correct but hmm...its what I could come up with at the moment :smile:
 
Hmm I think that's getting me somewhere though. Thanks cefarix, I appreciate it!
 
Are you guys serious??! Isn't the statement "all men are created equal" a philosophical statement rather then a mathematical one?? Surely there is no mathematical argument you can use to prove that just because the first k men were created equal, that this somehow emplied the (k+1)st man is equal to one of the 1st k?? What does it mean for men to be equal anyway?
:confused: :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K