View Full Version : Figuring out the curvature of a line?
mr_coffee
Oct3-05, 10:29 AM
Hello everyone, i'm trying to figure out the curvature of a line, First i'm suppose to make a hypothisis on what i think it would be, then i'm suppose to put a line in parametric vector form and find out really what the curvature of the line is. Well a line is pretty straight, so why can't I say the curvature is 0? or very close to 0? Well i got the line in parametric form passing through point (xo,yo,zo):
x = xo + at
y = yo + bt
z = zo + ct
So a line in 3 dimensions pass through (x1,y1) and (x2, y2) has parametric vector equation:
x = x1 + (x2-x1)t
Did i do this part right? Now i'm confused on what i'm suppose to do! Any help would be great!
Hello everyone, i'm trying to figure out the curvature of a line, First i'm suppose to make a hypothisis on what i think it would be, then i'm suppose to put a line in parametric vector form and find out really what the curvature of the line is. Well a line is pretty straight, so why can't I say the curvature is 0? or very close to 0? Well i got the line in parametric form passing through point (xo,yo,zo):
x = xo + at
y = yo + bt
z = zo + ct
So a line in 3 dimensions pass through (x1,y1) and (x2, y2) has parametric vector equation:
x = x1 + (x2-x1)t
Did i do this part right? Now i'm confused on what i'm suppose to do! Any help would be great!
The curvature of a line? Think about it. What does curvature mean geometrically? What does a line look like? If you understand the concept of curvature you shouldn't need to do any work at all on this problem :smile:
mr_coffee
Oct3-05, 11:06 AM
well the The curvature is the measure of its deviation from the straightness. So of course its going to be 0 for a line. But he wants us to show what the curvature is, using forumla's, so I can't just not show any work.
mr_coffee
Oct3-05, 11:10 AM
He told us that, if we use the "right" equation, everything will just fall apart?
He told us that, if we use the "right" equation, everything will just fall apart?
Use r=<x0+at, y0+bt, z0+ct>
and
\kappa =\frac{\left|\mathbf{r}'\times\mathbf{r}''\right|} {\left|\mathbf{r}'\right|^{3}}
mr_coffee
Oct3-05, 11:34 AM
Awesome thank u! I ended up with this:
r' = <a,b,c>
r'' = <0,0,0>
|<a,b,c> x <0,0,0>| = 0; so that proves its 0 correct?
Awesome thank u! I ended up with this:
r' = <a,b,c>
r'' = <0,0,0>
|<a,b,c> x <0,0,0>| = 0; so that proves its 0 correct?
It certainly does.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.