Work required to pull a hanging chain

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ginny Mac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Pull Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work required to pull a hanging chain back onto a frictionless table. The chain has a specified length and mass, with part of it hanging over the edge. Participants explore concepts related to gravitational potential energy and the work-energy theorem in the context of this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the work done against gravity and the change in gravitational potential energy as the chain is raised. There are attempts to calculate work using both direct methods and integration, as well as considerations of the center of mass of the hanging portion of the chain.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and guidance regarding the calculation methods, including the importance of considering the center of mass. Multiple approaches are being explored, including direct calculations and integration, but there is no explicit consensus on the final method to be used.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of different methods for calculating work, including potential errors in mass distribution and the significance of the center of mass in determining gravitational potential energy changes. There is an emphasis on ensuring accurate calculations and understanding the physics involved.

Ginny Mac
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A chain is held on a frictionless table with one-fourth of its length hanging over the edge. If the chain has length L= 28 cm and mass m=0.012 kg, how much work is required to pull the hanging part back onto the table?

I have used this model: W horizontal + Work due to gravity = Work

So...
Wg = (0.012 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(.07 m)(cos 180)
= -5.0 * 10^-3 J

Then I used the work-kinetic energy theorem (change in K = W) because we do not know anything about the force applied to the chain. I get:

change in K = W due to the horizontal force + Work due to grav. + Work due to normal force

change in K is zero, because the object is stationary before and after the pull, so...

0= (W due to horizon. force) - (5.0 * 10^-3) + (5.0 * 10^-3), so...
Work due to force = 0

I just get zero work for the horizon. force. Is the only work done here the Work due to gravity? Should I just leave it at -5.0 * 10^-3 J, if that answer is even correct?? Hmm...

Thank you,
Ginny
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only work required is the work done against gravity. Hint: What's the change in gravitational PE of the chain when it's raised from the initial hanging position to be totally on the table?
 
Okay...thanks Doc...I think I am beginning to understand. With that in mind, I used:

change in potential energy = -W

change in PE = mg(y-yinitial)

change in U = (0.012 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.07-0 m)
change in U = .008232 J, or 8.2 * 10^-3 J

So Work would be -8.2 * 10^-3 J.

I appreciate your feedback. Hope I am on the right track now!
 
Some comments. The only part of the chain that changes its PE is the part that is hanging off the table. What is the mass of that piece? How high must it be raised to get up to the table? (Note that each segment of the hanging section is a different distance from the table top.)
 
Hmmm..do you suggest that I calculate work for each little piece of chain, and then add them all together? For instance, (.012kg/.28m) = .0429kg/m. Then calculate for this mass at different distances, such as

change in U = (.0429kg/m)(9.8m/s^2)(.07-0m) = .0294 J, then
change in U = (.0429kg/m)(9.8m/s^2)(.06-0m) = .0252 J, and so on...

...to arrive at 0.1176 J, or W = -0.1176 J.

You are helping me to think about this in a different way...thank you. I just hope that I get into the right frame of thinking! I sure appreciate it.
~Gin
 
Ginny Mac said:
Hmmm..do you suggest that I calculate work for each little piece of chain, and then add them all together? For instance, (.012kg/.28m) = .0429kg/m. Then calculate for this mass at different distances, such as

change in U = (.0429kg/m)(9.8m/s^2)(.07-0m) = .0294 J, then
change in U = (.0429kg/m)(9.8m/s^2)(.06-0m) = .0252 J, and so on...
That's the right idea, but you are off by a factor of 100! I assume you are imagining the chain in 0.01m (not 1m) pieces.

That method will give you an approximate answer. To get the exact answer, you'll have to integrate.

There's an easier way: Consider the change in the height of the center of mass of the hanging piece.
 
So if use
m1x1 + m2x2 + m3x3 + etc.../M

And plug in (.0429kg)(.07m) + (.0429kg)(.06m) +...etc. divided by 0.012 kg,

= 0.99167m

This will give me the location of the center of mass...and then I can use this to calculate the work?? I don't know where to go from here.

What does this mean?:
Consider the change in the height of the center of mass of the hanging piece.
Ginny
 
Ginny Mac said:
So if use
m1x1 + m2x2 + m3x3 + etc.../M

And plug in (.0429kg)(.07m) + (.0429kg)(.06m) +...etc. divided by 0.012 kg,

= 0.99167m

This will give me the location of the center of mass...and then I can use this to calculate the work?? I don't know where to go from here.
Well you could find the center of mass that way (at least approximately) if you do it correctly. If you are taking 1 cm long pieces, what is the mass of each piece? (It's not .0429 kg--that's more mass than the whole chain!) And what's the mass of the hanging piece? Remember, you are trying to find the center of mass of just the hanging piece.

But there's a much easier way to locate the center of mass of the hanging piece. Think about it. You have a uniform chain that's 7 cm long hanging vertically. Where do you think the center of mass is?

What does this mean?:
Consider the change in the height of the center of mass of the hanging piece.
If you want to find the work done against gravity to raise an object, find the change in its gravitational PE. And that only depends on the location of the center of mass.
 
Alright, thanks Doc! Check this out:

(1) Center of Mass Method

m=0.012 kg/.28 m = .0428kg/m*.07m = 0.003 kg. We'll call this m1, as it is the mass of the 0.07 m hanging off the table.

Then
change in U = (0.003 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(.07m/2) <----(center of mass)
=.001029
change in U = 1.029*10^-3 J, so W is -1.029*10^-3 J.

(2) Integration Method

We get the same answer if we integrate:
change in U = [integral] mgy dy
change in U = mg (y^2/2)
density(m) = (0.012 kg/.28 m)
so...
change in U = (1/2)(0.012 kg/.28m)(9.8 m/s^2)(.07 m)^2
=.001029
change in U= 1.029*10^-3 J, therefore W = -1.029*10^-3 J

BTW, what program are ya'll using to post integrals and other notations?? I'd like to learn how to use it. Thanks a lot -
Gin
 
  • #10
Ginny Mac said:
(1) Center of Mass Method

m=0.012 kg/.28 m = .0428kg/m*.07m = 0.003 kg. We'll call this m1, as it is the mass of the 0.07 m hanging off the table.

Then
change in U = (0.003 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(.07m/2) <----(center of mass)
=.001029
change in U = 1.029*10^-3 J, so W is -1.029*10^-3 J.
Careful. The center of mass is not at 0.07m below the table, but 0.035m below! (But you got the right answer somehow. :smile: ) Also: Be careful of the sign of the work: The work required to lift the chain is positive, since the force and the displacement are in the same direction (up). (The work that gravity does is negative.)
(2) Integration Method

We get the same answer if we integrate:
change in U = [integral] mgy dy
change in U = mg (y^2/2)
density(m) = (0.012 kg/.28 m)
so...
change in U = (1/2)(0.012 kg/.28m)(9.8 m/s^2)(.07 m)^2
=.001029
change in U= 1.029*10^-3 J, therefore W = -1.029*10^-3 J
Excellent.
BTW, what program are ya'll using to post integrals and other notations?? I'd like to learn how to use it.
It's called Latex and it's easy to learn. (At least the basics are easy.) Learn about it here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
5K