Information about special and general relativity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the availability and reliability of online resources related to special and general relativity. Participants explore the credibility of specific websites and the qualifications of their authors, while also touching on broader themes of science communication and the challenges of distinguishing credible information from less reliable sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights the abundance of online resources about relativity but warns about the presence of unreliable information, suggesting that users should rely on reputable university sites.
  • Another participant discusses a specific site by Patricia Schwarz, noting her credentials as a Caltech PhD physicist and her contributions to popularizing string theory, while expressing a desire for her to engage more with research on quantizing General Relativity.
  • There is an acknowledgment of the challenges in finding trustworthy information, especially when the syllabus encourages speculation on non-mainstream topics.
  • Participants share their methods for gathering information online, indicating a collaborative approach to exploring resources.
  • One participant expresses admiration for another's knowledge and ability to find relevant links, while also noting a personal limitation in memory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of credible sources for information on relativity, but there is no consensus on the reliability of specific sites or the broader implications of the information available online.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying perspectives on the credibility of online resources and the qualifications of authors, with no resolution on which sources are definitively trustworthy.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
http://science.uniserve.edu.au/school/curric/stage6/phys/space/relativ.html

There are many, many sites on the web with information about special and general relativity. Unfortunately this is an area which attracts the crazies, and you have to be very careful about whether you can trust the information you read. This is particularly true because the syllabus asks teacher and students to speculate on topics which are not, as yet, mainstream physics, which takes you well into the realms of science fiction, and it becomes harder and harder to recognize the dividing line. It is best to stick with sites from the larger universities, or maintained by authors whose credentials you recognize
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what do you think about this site? there are lots of links
i have looked at a few and find them informative esp for
introduction to subject.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by wolram
what do you think about this site? there are lots of links
i have looked at a few and find them informative esp for
introduction to subject. [/B]

The site is by Patricia Schwarz
She is a caltech phd physicist
http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/patricia/index.html
she is a talented and passionate popularizer of string theory
the creator of the "official string theory" website
http://superstringtheory.com/
she also did the "John Schwarz 60th Birthday" website where
all the other string greats came and gave talks in his honor
in, I think, 2001.
she is passionate about several important causes, feminism
bringing more women into science, anti-racism (the fact that the greatest russian poet was Pushkin who suffered because of his part African makeup), respect for gays.
I wish she were also passionate supporter and explainer of research in the directions of quantizing General Relativity (the current efforts in loop gravity and spin foams). She has impressive talent, intelligence, and energy, and a great urge to teach using the Web.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow MARCUS are you john doe, or do you have a file
on everybody who is somebody, very impresive.
 
Originally posted by wolram
wow MARCUS are you john doe, or do you have a file
on everybody who is somebody, very impresive.
you and I are both thoughtful readers of the web
and use (I suspect) essentially the same gathering methods:
namely backspace in the URL field
and follow links. You gave me my first patricia link
and I followed leads. In this case it was easy and
all that stuff came right up. Not only don't I have
a file but also unfortunately my memory is lousy.
I think she is a neat lady regardless of the fact that
I don't agree with her on every topic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K