Quick question on a group definition

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zurtex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Group
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and properties of the group of unitriangular matrices, specifically UT(n, ℝ). Participants explore the conditions that define these matrices, including the role of diagonal elements and the implications for group structure. The conversation also touches on coursework challenges and methods for tackling related problems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the definition of UT(n, ℝ), specifically whether the diagonal elements must be unity in addition to the upper triangular condition.
  • Another participant confirms that the group consists of upper triangular matrices with unity diagonal elements, asserting that the added condition is necessary.
  • A participant expresses confidence in their approach to a related question, indicating they have made progress and have a method they believe will work.
  • One participant challenges an earlier claim about the center of the group, providing counterexamples with specific matrices A and B to illustrate their point.
  • Another participant acknowledges the error in their earlier notation and proposes a conjecture about the general form of elements in the group for n=3 and larger.
  • There is mention of testing the conjecture for larger n using Mathematica, indicating ongoing exploration of the topic.
  • A participant claims to have shown the conjecture is true for n=4 and n=5 and expresses intent to prove it in general.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement on the necessity of the unity condition for diagonal elements in unitriangular matrices. However, there is disagreement regarding the center of the group, with competing views and counterexamples presented, leaving the discussion unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of their findings for larger matrices and the generalization of their conjectures. There are also references to coursework and specific examples that may not be universally applicable.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in group theory, particularly those studying unitriangular matrices and their properties in a mathematical context.

Zurtex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
1
In a piece of coursework I need to work out some stuff about [itex]UT \left( n, \mathbb{R} \right)[/itex].
I forget what the definition of this, is it: given [itex]M \in UT \left( n, \mathbb{R} \right)[/itex] and represented by [itex]M = \left(a_{i, j} \right)[/itex] Where [itex]a_{i, j}[/itex] is a typical element of M then if i > j [itex]a_{i, j} = 0[/itex] else [itex]a_{i, j} \in \mathbb{R}[/itex].
Or was there the added condition that if i = j then [itex]a_{i, j} = 1[/itex]?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Group Definition

This group is called the group of unitriangular matrices, so called because it contains (upper) triangular matrices with the property that the diagonal elements are all unity. As such, the added condition is needed.
If you attended Dr Stöhr's lectures you should know this.
 
Diophantus said:
This group is called the group of unitriangular matrices, so called because it contains (upper) triangular matrices with the property that the diagonal elements are all unity. As such, the added condition is needed.
If you attended Dr Stöhr's lectures you should know this.
Haha thanks, I would also know this if Ruby wasn't being weird and gave me chance to photocopy her notes.

Anyway, I've made quite a bit of progress on that question, I think I have a better method of tackling it than any that we discussed :smile:
 
Oh right, I'm quite sure that my approach will work adequately so I'm sticking with that. I have a feeling that the second question will be trickier though but I'm not going to get stuck into it for a few days. I'll probably be in touch when I've had the chance to work on it.
 
kk, well, I just wanted to say some thing. I've just done a bit of work on the 1st question and you have the centre of the group wrong, I have a counter example.

Try something like:

[tex]A = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 & 5 & 7 \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 9 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1<br /> \end{array} \right)[/tex]

And:

[tex]B = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 & 3 & 2 \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1<br /> \end{array} \right)[/tex]

Particularly check the element of the 1st row, 3rd column for AB and BA
 
Alas, you are correct. That will teach me to use silly notation for the elements of my matrices(a, a', a'', a'''...). Closer examination leads to the conclusion that the general element of the group when n=3 is:

[tex]A = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}1 & 0 & a \\0 & 1 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 1\end{array} \right)[/tex]

and I conjecture that for larger n, the trend will continue i.e the general element is simply I with the top right zero replaced with a variable free to take any real value.

This should not, however, affect my chosen method of showing this to be true for all n.

In fact it should simplify it.
 
Last edited:
Indeed I've already worked this out, however I've not tested the trend for n > 3, I will later set up it in Mathematica to check for much larger matrices, but general life stuff to get on with now. I expect I will have determined and proven the centre by the end of the day and started on the 2nd problem :smile:
 
If it helps I've shown the conjecture is true for n = 4 and n = 5, I'm going to attempt to show it in general now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K