How Does Adding Mass Affect Velocity in a Frictionless System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a scenario where a girl runs and dives onto a sled on a frictionless hill, and the discussion centers around how adding mass affects the velocity of the system as they descend a vertical distance. The subject area includes concepts of kinetic energy, potential energy, and conservation of momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinetic and potential energy in the context of the problem, questioning the initial calculations and the use of conservation of momentum versus energy. There is confusion regarding the correct formulas and the implications of mass addition on velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering different perspectives on the correct approach to the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of conservation of momentum and energy, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct method to apply.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion about the distinction between algebraic and calculus approaches, with some participants emphasizing the need to avoid calculus in their reasoning. Additionally, the potential energy considerations after the fall are being questioned.

Trista
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Once again, I am pleading for help. Here is the problem and what I have done:
Gayle runs at a speed of 4.00 m/s and dives on a sled, initially at rest, on the top of a frictionless, snow-covered hill. After she has descended a vertical distance of 5.00m, her brother, who is initially at rest, hops on her back and they continue down the hill together. What is the final velocity if the total vertical distance is 15.0 m?
m1 = 50 kg
m2 = 5 kg
m3 = 30 kg
I figure I have to solve for the first part, where the girl jumps on the sled and goes 5 m:
KEi + PEi = KEf + PEf
| | | |
m1v1i +0 = m2v2f+mgh
50kg (4 m/s) = 55kg(v2f) + 55kg(9.8 m/s)(5 m)
then:
200 = 55kg(v2f) + 2695 then, subtracting 2695 from the right & left:
-2495 = 55kg (v2f) then, divide out the 55 from the right and then left:
-45.36 = v2f I suppose the negative sign shows they are traveling down the hill.
But then, assuming that my prior calculation is correct (which if it is, I want a ride on that sled), then I need to start over again except that my initial velocity would be v2f from the previous question, and I am looking for v3f, right? I hope this isn't too confusing, I'm trying to show that I've been working on this problem, and I would really like to understand it.
Thank you for your help! :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinetic energy is not mv. It is [itex]\int mvdv[/itex]

AM
 
ok, wait, this is the algebra section, right? that looks like an integral, and I'm doing algebra.
 
First of all kinetic energy is 1/2mv^2.
Also, after falling 5 meters the girl and sled have less potential energy than they did befor the fall, not more. You also should to use the conservation of momentum to find the new speed after the collision
 
Last edited:
Trista said:
ok, wait, this is the algebra section, right? that looks like an integral, and I'm doing algebra.
Ok. No calculus. You should know that KE = mv^2/2. Use your approach of conservation of energy.

There is a trick here though. The collision of the girl and the sled is not elastic. So you can use conservation energy only after the girl and sled starts moving together. As Daniel says, you have to use conservation of momentum to find that initial sled speed.

AM
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K