Gravitational potential energy question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the difference in gravitational potential energy for the artificial satellite Sputnik I as it moves from apogee to perigee. The context involves gravitational potential energy, specifically in relation to varying distances from the Earth's center.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations of gravitational potential energy at different altitudes and question whether the change in potential energy should be considered positive or negative based on altitude changes and gravitational force strength.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations for potential energies at both apogee and perigee, while others suggest verifying the gravitational force at those altitudes. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of potential energy being negative and how that relates to the work done against gravity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the assumption that gravitational potential energy is defined with respect to a reference point at infinity, leading to potential energy values being negative near the Earth. There is also a mention of the need for clarity on the sign convention for changes in potential energy.

wr1015
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
The first artificial satellite to orbit the Earth was Sputnik I, launched October 4, 1957. The mass of Sputnik I was 83.5 kg, and its distances from the center of the Earth at apogee and perigee were approximately 7370 km and 6560 km, respectively. Find the difference in gravitational potential energy for Sputnik I as it moved from apogee to perigee. (Use a positive sign for an increase, negative sign for a decrease in U.)

i've calculated the potential energies at both apogee and perigee and I'm thinking the answer would be negative since you're losing altitude so you're losing potential energy, but the force of gravity only gets stronger the closer to the Earth's surface you get. so would it be negative or positive?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you need to calculate both. I'm sure you can rather easily find the gravity at both altitudes. Then you can figure out exactly what the potential energies will be.
 
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/gpot.html

By convention,
the general expression for gravitational potential energy arises from the law of gravity and is equal to the work done against gravity to bring a mass to a given point in space. Because of the inverse square nature of the gravity force, the force approaches zero for large distances, and it makes sense to choose the zero of gravitational potential energy at an infinite distance away. The gravitational potential energy near a planet is then negative, since gravity does positive work as the mass approaches.
 
i got U @ apogee = -2419913865 J and U @ perigee = -2571509397 J, so then delta U would be Uapg - Uper = 151595532 J, is this right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K