vincentm
- 322
- 3
http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?display=rednews/2005/11/03/build/nation/96-nasa.inc
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion centers on the detection of traces of the earliest stars, with a focus on a report involving Ned Wright, an astronomy professor at UCLA. Wright expresses skepticism regarding the validity of the findings, arguing that the methodology for removing radiation contributions from other stars is imprecise. He believes the observed measurements may actually be residuals from nearby sources rather than signals from ancient stars. Caution is advised in interpreting these results.
PREREQUISITESAstronomy students, researchers in astrophysics, and professionals analyzing cosmic data will benefit from this discussion.
Ned Wright, an astronomy professor at UCLA, was more doubtful. He argued that the process of removing the radiation contribution of other stars is too imprecise to make the team's conclusions valid, and that the measurement it saw is not the signal of ancient stars.
"I'm very skeptical of this result. I think it's wrong," he said. "I think what they're seeing is incompletely subtracted residuals from nearby sources."