Understanding Operator Identity: A^+(Af(x))^*g(x) = f^*(x)A^+g(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Operator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the identity involving the hermitian conjugate of an operator A applied to functions f(x) and g(x). Participants are exploring the conditions under which the equality (Af(x))^*g(x) = f^*(x)A^+g(x) holds true, particularly in the context of inner product spaces and integration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question whether the identity holds without integration over all x, suggesting that a definite integral is necessary for the equality to be valid. Others discuss the implications of the inner product definition in relation to the operators involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on the identity. Some have provided insights into the conditions required for the equality to hold, while others are exploring the definitions and properties of the operators and functions involved. There is no explicit consensus yet, but various interpretations and approaches are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of boundary conditions, such as the behavior of functions at infinity, which may affect the validity of the identity. The definition of the inner product in the context of function spaces is also under discussion.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Can someone explain to me why for any operator A and functions f(x), g(x),

[tex](Af(x))^*g(x) = f^*(x)A^+g(x)[/tex]

Where "^+" denotes the hermitian conjugate of A.

I went to see the demonstrator about it and he couldn't explain/prove that result. Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that this is true only if you integrate over all x. That is, you need to have a definite integral.

The reason for this is that the usual example of A is [tex]i\partial_x[/tex]. To convert from the LHS to the RHS requires an integration by parts. In doing this integration, you will not get the right result unless you cancel off the integrated part using something like f(infinity) = g(infinity) = 0.

Carl
 
How is your innerproduct defined? For functions spaces it is normally the L2 innerproduct
[tex]<f,g>= \int_a^b f(x)g^*(x)dx[/tex]
for some a,b.

In that case,
[tex]<Af,g>= \int_a^b(Af(x))g^*(x)dx[/tex]
and
[tex]<f,Bg>= \int_a^bf(x)(Bg)^*(x)dx[/tex]

Comparing that with the definition of "Hermitian conjugate" should make it clear that those at equal if and onlyif B= A+.
 
Yesterday, I found a solution to this. It's very simple. First, I prove that for a function f, [itex]f^+ = f^*[/itex]. Since Af is a function, [itex](Af)^* = (Af)^+=f^+A^+=f^*A^+[/itex]. Voilà!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K