Script writers should check their writings

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Monique
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the accuracy and reliability of information presented in media, particularly in television shows and newspapers. Participants critique specific examples of misleading representations and the implications of such inaccuracies on public understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights a specific instance from a soap opera where a character incorrectly identifies a Dutch city as being in France, questioning the scriptwriters' research.
  • Another participant expresses frustration over frequent inaccuracies in media, noting that many viewers may not recognize these errors due to their obscurity.
  • A different participant argues that while soap operas are fictional, factual programs should strive for accuracy, citing examples of historical inaccuracies in documentaries.
  • Concerns are raised about misleading conclusions drawn in newspaper articles regarding health and gender pay disparities, suggesting that the comparisons made may not account for relevant factors like education level.
  • One participant mentions a major news network's claim that the moon landing was a hoax, framing it as a deliberate misinformation campaign.
  • A later reply dismisses the moon landing claim as old news, implying a lack of relevance in the current discussion.
  • Another participant reiterates the idea that media often presents information that is not thoroughly vetted, leading to widespread misinformation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the prevalence of inaccuracies in media, but there is no consensus on the implications or the extent of the problem. Multiple competing views on the nature of these inaccuracies and their impact on public perception remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the validity of claims made in media, highlighting the need for critical evaluation of sources. There is a recognition that the context in which information is presented can significantly influence its interpretation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals concerned with media literacy, critical thinking, and the impact of misinformation in society.

Monique
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,229
Reaction score
61
I was watching a television show which comments on strange television moments. They showed a clip from the American soap: As the World Turns.

This actress is in the middle of nowhere in France, trying to find her way to a spa. She meets some French people and asks them where she is.

..So the television host stops the clip and asks the public: what do you think those Americans will come up with, a French city in the middle of nowhere. Paris was the first thing that came to mind...

So they start the clip again. She is in 's Hertogenbosch according to the French playing actors, WHICH is a major city in The Netherlands. What are these script writers thinking?? They looked into the atlas and though 'that's a nice name, let's go with that', I think it is pretty stupid.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I see/hear things like that all the time in media, and it can become extremely frustrating at times because they'll often say things that will mislead many people.

You also have to consider that the city is largely obscure to most people, so they wouldn't even question it; indeed, most obscure to Americans which is the target demographic of the soap. I'm American, and although the name is quite obviously not French, I wouldn't have second-guessed it.
 
Soaps are fiction --- no one uses them as travelogues, or histories, but "your" town is at least on the correct continent. History, Learning, and Discovery Channels purport to present facts --- and butcher them horribly --- in how many oceans and how many wars can one ship be sunk --- HMS Barham has to hold a record.
 
Well, that 'town' is a large city, such gross mistakes should not be made in present day information technology society.

It is a general phenomena.

Today I was reading one of the major newspapers. It had the following article: "Humans thrive best on prehistoric diet", why? Research showed that cave people did not suffer from heart and blood disease, decalcification (right translation?), obesity, allergies or high blood pressure. Conclusion: we should all start eating meat, leaves and berries to become healthy again. Did it ever occur to those people that cave-dweller did not live long enough to develop these syndroms??

Same newspaper, different article: "Trainee compensation is inequally distributed", commenting that females get less money than males when doing an internship. The way they determined that? They compared a female with a MBO (middle professional education) degree with a guy with a HBO (high professional education) degree. Their conclusion: the latter received more money, thus females get paid less (could it have been their level of education??).

More misinformation: in the television program I mentioned before, they showed a clip of a soccer coach giving a press interview after the 6-0 victory and qualification for the European championships. The coach expresses his dismay with the press, since they brought out a negative story on the soccer team. The clip ends in him saying that they are going to undertake legal steps against the press, namely a magazine and the public news station. Next, the exact same clip is shown, but now broadcasted by the public news station (which has a very very good reputation btw) but magically in this clip, only the magazine is being sued, the news station edited themselves off of the clip! (cowards)

That is why I say that these people should check their writings and think if it is really correct what they are saying.
 
Over here on this side of the pond, we have a major news network telling people the moon landing was a hoax. Not just a mistake, or even a white lie -- but a boldfaced, sensationalized, intentional lie.

- Warren
 
But that is old news :P
 
Originally posted by Monique
Well, that 'town' is a large city, such gross mistakes should not be made in present day information technology society.

It is a general phenomena.

Today I was reading one of the major newspapers. It had the following article: "Humans thrive best on prehistoric diet", why? Research showed that cave people did not suffer from heart and blood disease, decalcification (right translation?), obesity, allergies or high blood pressure. Conclusion: we should all start eating meat, leaves and berries to become healthy again. Did it ever occur to those people that cave-dweller did not live long enough to develop these syndroms??

Same newspaper, different article: "Trainee compensation is inequally distributed", commenting that females get less money than males when doing an internship. The way they determined that? They compared a female with a MBO (middle professional education) degree with a guy with a HBO (high professional education) degree. Their conclusion: the latter received more money, thus females get paid less (could it have been their level of education??).

A pretty typical non sequitor and ad baculum argument, respectively, put forth by the media. The basic reality is that ALL information disseminated by media is apocryphal at best, so you really have to consider the source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K