Kinematics Basics: Mass, Photons & Reflection

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vaishakh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of mass, energy, and the behavior of photons during reflection and refraction. Participants explore the implications of photons being massless, their kinetic energy in the context of the photoelectric effect, and the nature of reflection and refraction in relation to classical mechanics and wave theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that photons are considered massless and question how they can possess kinetic energy, particularly in the context of the photoelectric effect.
  • One participant emphasizes that the equation for kinetic energy from Newtonian mechanics does not apply at relativistic speeds, suggesting a limitation in classical interpretations.
  • Another participant clarifies that photons have energy defined by E=hf and can transfer this energy to electrons, but they do not possess kinetic energy in the traditional sense.
  • There is a discussion about whether the act of reflection takes any time, with some participants suggesting that reflection involves a brief absorption of the photon by electrons in the mirror.
  • One participant proposes that reflection can be understood as a half-cycle of the wave, where the original photon is absorbed and a different photon is emitted, raising questions about the conservation of boson number.
  • Another participant challenges the analogy of photons to classical objects, suggesting that the properties of photons differ significantly from those of macroscopic objects like balls.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of absorption and emission processes on the perceived speed of light in materials, with some arguing that these processes take a finite amount of time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the nature of photons, their energy, and the processes of reflection and refraction. Participants express uncertainty and differing interpretations of how these phenomena occur, indicating that consensus has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in their understanding of complex concepts such as the relationship between energy, momentum, and the behavior of photons during interactions with materials. The discussion reflects a reliance on various interpretations of physical principles without resolving the underlying complexities.

vaishakh
Messages
334
Reaction score
0
I know that scientists have two meanings on masses. One is the resistance against motion and other the quantity of existence. Since photons travel with the speed of light, they are considered to be massless. And it also supports the fact that they never resist motion. In fact they always move with the speed of light. But in photoelectric effect it is said that due to high frequency light the electrons get emitted due to the photoelectric effect. But how can photons which are massless have kinetic energy.
Now when a photon strikes a mirror it reflects back. The action of reflection here is instantaneous or takes no time here since the photons tend to continue to move with the speed of light. Similar is the case of refraction. I think I am correct. I need an expert's verification of my statements. (A small doubt - what is the difference between deviation and deflection?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
K.E = .5 m v^2
this is the equation u are lookin upto while having photon and photoelectric effect in ur mind, as u should know this is a equation from Newtonian Mechanics and Newtonian mechanics doesn't hold on at relevastic speeds.
I don't know what are you talking abt continue motion of photon. and there's change in speed of photons while passing through a material it happenes in refration also in mirror, mirror is a glass slab with one side covered with reflecting material, u know. But i still can't get the ppoint u r talkin about.
 
A photon has energy (E=hf) where h is Planck's constant and f is the photon frequency. The electron in the metal can absorb this energy and transfer it into kinetic energy of the electron, and if sufficient free the electron from the metal. While a photon has energy it is never said to have kinetic energy because a photon is a different entity to a particle with mass. A photon does however have momentum as derived by Einstein which is (p=E/c).
 
thank you. you made a major part where i have misunderstanding very clear.

yes, i recall of reading about force neededto stop a photon as such. it has mommentum and not kinetic energy. how does such a thind happen? am i too small to understand such things?

jimmy, i am sorry about refraction anyway, think about reflection. what i want to know is whether the act of reflection takes any time. just like in basic kinematics if you hit a ball straight back down the ground, the ball is at rest for an instant when it touches the bat. but such property should not be shown by photons, isn' t it?
 
Don't push these analogies too far, but:

In a sense, reflection from a mirror metal surface takes a half-cycle of the wave -
the reflected wave is half a wave out-of-synch from the incoming wave.
The Electric field switches direction when reflecting at the metal surface,
and the magnetic field penetrates into the metal about 1/4 wavelength.

In a sense, the Energy of a photon is half Kinetic Energy (KE = 1/2 p v)
and is half Potential Energy, residing in the Electric Field of the wave.

Now, the "more correct" understanding of reflection is that the original
photon dives into the material and is eventually absorbed,
while the photon that comes out, as if it was the reflected photon,
is actually a *different* photon than the one that hit the metal.
Photons are *bosons*, and boson number is NOT conserved.
 
Last edited:
think about reflection. what i want to know is whether the act of reflection takes any time. just like in basic kinematics if you hit a ball straight back down the ground, the ball is at rest for an instant when it touches the bat. but such property should not be shown by photons, isn' t it?,
well it depends on your point of view. In case of refraction let's say, you know the length of glass slab you are using, you know the speed of light while it passes through that galss slab, and obviously you can calculate the time taken by, let's say a photon, in traveling across the slab.
And same would happen in case of reflaction. but we are just too slow to recognise it.
 
Most reflections take place off a metallic surface. When a photon hits that surface an electron will absorb the photon for a brief time, typically 10^-8 seconds (correct me if I'm wrong I'm working from memory here). In that snse it takes a finite time to reflect the image. For refraction through an object a similar absorption process occurs thus making it appear that the light has reduced speed when in fact it hasn't, it is just being absorbed and emitted many times which takes a finite time too.
 
I assume that the boson number is the spin number. Anyway photons show particle nature. If a ball is spun and thrown on a wall, while coming back the direction of spin would have changed. Why not such a thing could have happened and we feel that the photon is another photon but infact the boson number has changed due to the collision with the mirror surface. The boson number changes is the only observation that led the scientist to think in such a way or is there in other proof I don’t know? Anyway a metal surface is opaque. So where does that photon which dives go if you theorem is any way correct. I also think that according to this theory the energy in the other photon that comes back is being transferred from this photon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K