Finding Fourier Series f(x)=1 & Integrating for g(x)=x on 0<=x<=pi

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the Fourier series for the function f(x)=1 over the interval 0 <= x <= π, specifically in terms of the sine basis functions {sin(nx)}. The correct Fourier series is established as 2/π ∑(1 - cos(nπ))/n sin(nx), with the stipulation that n must be odd to avoid vanishing summands. Integration of the series leads to a convergent series for g(x)=x, resulting in -4/π ∑(1 - cos(2k-1)x)/(2k-1)^2, where the term (2k-1)^2 arises from constants of integration evaluated at x=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series and their convergence properties.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities, particularly cosine functions.
  • Knowledge of series manipulation and summation techniques.
  • Basic calculus skills, especially integration of series.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier series convergence, particularly uniform convergence.
  • Learn about the implications of odd and even functions in Fourier series representation.
  • Explore integration techniques for Fourier series and their applications in solving differential equations.
  • Investigate the role of constants of integration in series solutions and their evaluation at specific points.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers interested in Fourier analysis, particularly those working with periodic functions and series integration techniques.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
Find the Fourier series for f(x)=1 on the interval 0 <=x <= pi in temrs of phi = sin nx. By integrating thi series find a convergent series for hte function g(x) =x oin this interval assuming that the set {sin nx} is complete

i can find the Fourier series for f(x) =1. But i would like to know why n is supposed to be odd because the answer i get is
[tex]\frac{2}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1 - \cos(n \pi)}{n} \sin(nx)[/tex]
the text ssumes n is odd. Is it because if n was even then the summand would be zero?
the answer in the text is [tex]\frac{4}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(2k-1) x}{2k-1}[/tex]

How would i integrate the series?
f i integrate the answer for the text i get [tex]\frac{-4}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos(2k-1) x}{(2k-1)^2}[/tex]
but hte answer in the book i
[tex]\frac{-4}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1-\cos(2k-1) x}{(2k-1)^2}[/tex]

why or where is that 1 / (2k-1)^2 term coming from? Can someone please help?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
Find the Fourier series for f(x)=1 on the interval 0 <=x <= pi in temrs of phi = sin nx. By integrating thi series find a convergent series for hte function g(x) =x oin this interval assuming that the set {sin nx} is complete
i can find the Fourier series for f(x) =1. But i would like to know why n is supposed to be odd because the answer i get is
[tex]\frac{2}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1 - \cos(n \pi)}{n} \sin(nx)[/tex]
the text ssumes n is odd. Is it because if n was even then the summand would be zero?

Precisely. Try plugging different values of n in cos(n pi). You will see that cos(n pi) = (-1)^n. Hence, for n even, cos(n pi)=1 and the summand vanishes. Now your sum is over all odd positive integers. But you can restore the sum to be over all positive integer by noting that the change of variable n-->2k-1 (with k running over the naturals) spans exactly every odd positive integers. This is what the book did.

stunner5000pt said:
How would i integrate the series?
If you've seen how to prove the uniform convergence of Fourier series, do it. If not, assume it does converge uniformly such that the integral of the sum is the serie of the integrals.

stunner5000pt said:
f i integrate the answer for the text i get [tex]\frac{-4}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos(2k-1) x}{(2k-1)^2}[/tex]
but hte answer in the book i
[tex]\frac{-4}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1-\cos(2k-1) x}{(2k-1)^2}[/tex]
why or where is that 1 / (2k-1)^2 term coming from? Can someone please help?
Thank you

I think it comes from the constants of integration and then evaluating the serie at x=0, but I don't understand the mechanism exactly. It is true that setting one constant 0 and the other 1 / (2k-1)^2 makes the serie work when evaluating at x = 0, but how can we be sure that these are the right constant?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K