Who came up with the term 'multiverse'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter madcat11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea Multiverse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the origin of the term 'multiverse' and its historical context within both scientific and science fiction literature. Participants explore the etymology of the term, its first usage, and its evolution over time.

Discussion Character

  • Historical
  • Meta-discussion
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the origin of the term 'multiverse' and its association with parallel universe theories.
  • Another participant cites Wikipedia, stating that Andy Nimmo coined the term in December 1960 during a talk on the Everett many-worlds interpretation, providing a definition that contrasts with the traditional meaning of 'universe.'
  • A participant expresses the belief that the concept of multiple universes predates the Everett interpretation and suggests it was present in science fiction literature.
  • Another participant attributes the branching universe idea to Will F. Jenkins, noting his story "Sidewise in Time" from the late 1930s as influential in popularizing the theme in science fiction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the origins of the term 'multiverse,' with differing views on its historical context and the influence of science fiction literature.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions and interpretations of the term 'multiverse' over time, as well as the influence of various literary works on its conceptual development.

madcat11
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Anyone know just who (and when?) came up with the term 'multiverse' to describe the parallel or multiple universe theories?

thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I just found the answer myself on Wikipedia:

"The term Multiverse was invented in December 1960, by Andy Nimmo, then vice chairman of the British Interplanetary Society, Scottish Branch, for a talk on the Everett many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics which had been published in 1957, to the branch. This was given in February 1961, and the word with its original definition, "an apparent universe, a multiplicity of which, go to make up the whole universe" was then first used. This was because the then dictionary definition of the word 'universe' was, "All that there is" and one cannot have "Alls that there is" etymologically. 'Uni' means one, and 'multi' means many, so you can have many multiverses.

The word was then both used correctly and misused in both scientific and science fiction circles over several years by those who attended the meeting and others. In the late 1960s science fiction author Michael Moorcock interpreted the word in a novel that was read by David Deutsch. Deutsch then used the term "multiverse" in a scientific work as the totality of all possible universes throughout time, including our observable universe- the opposite of its previous definition. Other scientists, not being etymologists, then picked up and adopted the popular redefinition of the word. "

...sorry, I should have looked a bit first, then posted.
 
im sure this idea was even before everret interpetation of quantum mechanics, i strongly believe the notion of idea was in sci-fi literature.
 
Although alternate history novels (what if Napoleon had won at Waterloo, etc.) already existed in the nineteenth century, the credit for a universe that branches at decision points is apparently due to Will F. Jenkins, an sf writer who published his story "Sidewise in Time" in the late 1930s. The idea quickly became a popular theme of sf.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K