Wheels and Crazy Spinning Things

  • Thread starter Thread starter dazedandconfused
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spinning Wheels
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the rotational dynamics of two wheels, "B1" and "B2", both with a diameter of 40 inches, rolling at 4 miles per hour. Calculations reveal that while "B2" rotates at approximately 33.61 RPM, the smaller wheels "A" (12 inches) and hubs "C1" and "C2" (1 inch) rotate significantly faster, with "C2" reaching around 1344.54 RPM. The conclusion confirms that belt "D2" will indeed rotate hub "C2" faster than belt "D1" rotates hub "C1" due to the larger circumference of "B2". The calculations are validated, emphasizing the importance of checking for errors in the algebra involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics
  • Familiarity with circumference and RPM calculations
  • Knowledge of basic algebra for rearranging equations
  • Concept of belt drive systems in mechanical engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rotational motion in physics
  • Learn about belt drive systems and their applications
  • Explore the effects of friction on rotational speed
  • Investigate the relationship between wheel size and RPM in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, hobbyists interested in mechanics, and anyone exploring the dynamics of rotating systems.

dazedandconfused
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Wheels and Crazy Spinning Things!

For the illustration of the following model, go to http://www.corniceventures.com/images/wheels.JPG

If the 2 wheels ("B1" and "B2") are the same diameter (40 inches) and are rolling forward at 4 miles per hour...Would belts "D1" and "D2" rotate hubs "C1" and "C2" respectively at the same rate (rpm's)?

Here are all the parameters:

"B1" and "B2" Diameter >> 40 inches
"A" Diameter >> 12 inches
"C1" and "C2" Diameter >> 1 inch

Here is what my calculations told me:

"B2" Circumference >> ~125.66 inches
"A" Circumference >> ~37.70 inches
"C1" and "C2" Circumference >> ~3.14 inches
"B2" RPMs at 4 MPH >> ~33.61 rpm
"A" RPMs at 4 MPH >> ~112.05 rpm
"C1" and "C2" RPMs at 4 MPH >> ~1344.54 rpm

To me it seems that belt "D2" would rotate hub "C2" more quickly than belt "D1" would rotate hub "C1" given the same forward speed, but maybe I should trust my calculations! Any help would be appreciated, thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Both big wheels spin with ω = 4mph/40in. (convert that into rpm)

Assuming the belts don't slip:
ωA*rA = ωC1*rC1

and

ωB2*rB2 = ωC2*rC2

Note that ωA = ωB2 = ω

Rearrange to find one hub speed in terms of the other:

[itex]\omega_{C1} = \frac{r_A}{r_{C1}}\,\frac{r_{C2}}{r_{B2}}\omega_{C2}[/itex]

and since the hubs (C1 & C2) are the same size:

[itex]\omega_{C1} = \frac{r_A}{r_{B2}}\omega_{C2}[/itex]

So the hubs spin at different rates; since the radius (diameter) of B2 is greater than A, Hub C2 will spin faster than hub C1. So, your intuition was good, but there was some error in your calculations (I can't say where you went wrong without seeing your work). You should follow this line of thought out yourself to understand the idea and to double-check the algebra.
 


Based on your calculations, it does appear that belt "D2" would rotate hub "C2" at a faster rate than belt "D1" would rotate hub "C1" if they were both moving at the same speed. This is because the circumference of "B2" is larger than the circumference of "A", which means it will make more rotations in the same amount of time. This, in turn, will cause the smaller belt "D2" to rotate at a faster rate in order to keep up with the larger wheel.

It's always a good idea to double check your calculations and make sure everything is accurate, but based on the information provided, your calculations seem to be correct. It's also important to note that there may be other factors at play, such as friction and the weight of the wheels, that could affect the rotation speed. Overall, it's a fun and interesting concept to explore!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K