Born unmathematical
Hey I'm new here!
I go to secondary high and I dropped maths this second year because my selfconfidence is so low when it comes to maths. I lved algebra, but I nearly failed on many of the tests and longer examinations. I see there are so many intelligent people here, compared to me, and I will not be able to join the discussions or answer any questions  which I would be glad to do if I could. My problem is that I love maths, but no matter how hard I worked I got average grades and below that, except on algebra where I did very well. I NEED to buy a few good books on mathematics. And I am also interested in rocket science. I need to revive my memory of what maths was like!:) All recommendations are welcome! And then I have a last question: Are there many men/boys in this forum? 
I recommend persistence.
It took me a few tries to get the hang of calculus but once I did freshman and sophomore mathematics was a breeze. It took a few tries to get the hang of mathematical reasoning but now that I have abstract algebra was a breeze. Of course, everyone here is ready to help if necessary. Doug 
I too loved math in HS, and I had trouble with exams, although apparently not as much as you. My problem was slips of the pencil in doing problems. I would miscopy a digit or whatever and get the wrong answer. This was long before calculators and there was a lot of copying from log tables and sine and cosine tables.
What I did was read popular books on math to keep my interest and understanding up, and gradually as I got older I was able to force myself to check and recheck everything before I submite it. Part of my problem was that I was too eager to do all the problems and had been too hasty in leaving one and going to the next. Fixing that helped and I was able to do well on the tests in college. Whatever you do, if you love math, don't label yourself "born unmathematical". Don't blame math either. Blame the school if you must, or your age, which will change, but don't give up on yourself. And do follow the topics that interest you here. Not everything winds up in math. ( edit:heh  had to edit some typos. Proves what I said. Maybe I'm "born fumblefingered"?) 
Re: Born unmathematical
Quote:

Thank you all for the support. I am going to buy a couple of books when I, hopefully, get money for Christmas.
SelfAdjoint, what did you read? Would any of that be of interest for me do you think? The reason I asked if there were men/boys in here was only because I think mathematicians, physicists and other sciencemen are...yummy! 
my karate teacher always had us spar with blackbelts first. they basically always kicked our butts but we learned real quick. i think that that is one way to go about it: participate with the more advanced students and see where it goes.
in math in particular, it is often useful to attend a colloqium you won't understand. i was fortunate enough to attend a few at the ucla math for the next century (millenium?) and i did understand very little of these masters. i am but a disciple, as hilbert would put it. the thing is you can at least learn some new words and if any of it looks interesting, visit a mathdictionary and look up the words. indeed, you can spend hours just on mathworld, for example. look up one word you don't understand and look up all the links and all the links linked to in those links, etc. you can really get a grip on things, if not a real good understanding, rather quickly that way. math is not different from any pursuit like music or writing or whatever: you must be persistent and it will be a process like two steps forward and one step back (there are always setbacks even for the best people). i believe being born unmathematical is extremely rare. btw, i've only been very interested in math for about 12 years. i was terrible at long division and now i'm coming up with ways to divide infinite sets. i hated algebra and got a D in it and now i like abstract algebra. give yourself 12 years of doing what i said above and i bet you'll be just fine. one of my friends didn't know much math and he was at the precalculus level and decided to take set theory at the same time. well, that's not recommended because of the potential damage that might do to your selfesteem, but it is possible. what i might do if i were you is take a proof course meant for those transferring from lower division (first 2 years of college) to upper divison. i bet that if you understand that 10%, it will make your algebra look like a cake walk. 
Quote:
<edit> I heartily endorse phoenixthoth's suggestion of going a little over your head. Since you're blue about your math interaction with the normal program it will boost your pride to see that you can actually grasp some of the harder stuff. Morale is important. 
Thank you, selfAdjoint!

I was Christmas browsing in Barnes & Noble today and I saw a wonderful suggestion for you. It's called What is Quantum Mechanics, a Physics Adventure, and it's apparently by a collaboration of authors called Transnation TEX. It's in large format paperback and is aimed at high school level people who like this stuff. It is an honest presentation, and does do the math but it spends an enormous amount of time and effort motivating the math, and the unfamiliar physics. The presentation is , well, cute, which could put some people off. But I remember my own experience with Lieber's Relativity book which also uses cute. I think I took the cuteness as an author's guarantee that if I had trouble, it wasn't my fault but hers, since she wouldn't have gone to all that trouble if she was expecting her reader to be one of the elite few. Which is very liberating.

The TI83 brought me into the world of mathematics.
I remember in high school we were finding zeros of polynomials and I had no idea what we were doing, I used basic calc in physics and math while everyone else had a fancy graphing calc. I dismissed their advantage. When I got a free TI83, seeing equations graphed, intersections, and zeros etc allowed me grasp math much better. 
Hi Thallium,
You wrote: Quote:
Why do you think mathematicians have the motivation to find and solve problems? (which is not an easy task) I'd like to know what do you think. 
I did not 'discover' mathematics until I was around 12. It was during that year that during a strange session in class I managed to outsmart all my other classmates into solving what I later discovered to be a simplification of the famous Gauss problem (1 + 2 + ... + 1000). My teacher was a little astounded as I had not shown any real mathematical prowess until then, and I was subsequently recruited into the math team. The preparation for a math competition required that I delved a whole year ahead into the mathematics I was supposed to be learning. It was when I started learning all these mathematics on my own and at my own pace (the teacher was too lazy to train the math team) that I discovered how fun mathematics really was. So you really shouldn't put down yourself as it is never really too late to gain a liking, and subsequently some ability in it.
Learning mathematics from the textbook on my own helped me a lot. Perhaps, you should try it yourself and not wait for the teacher. Of course, you should try familiarizing yourself with broad parts of mathematics. I found 'amateur' mathematical books for the layman such as Simon Singh's The Code Book and Fermat's Last Theorem spurred my interest in mathematics to higher levels. I also enjoy working on monthly mathematical problems available on the internet. Here's an excellent website that I visit from time to time: www.nrich.maths.org.uk. 
Quote:

Quote:

Once upon a time a little fish asked his mother: "Mammy, one of my friends told me the that there exist somthing, which its name is 'water', so Mammy where can we find this water?"
Without another point of view on something, it is hard to understand it. Please read this: http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilber...roduction.html and this: http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion43.html by Prof. Doron Zeilberger. 
I have had a brief look at both, but what am I supposed to understand with this? Am I supposed to be inspired?
Because there are so many difficult words that I cannot find in the dictionary, especially on the first link. 
Hi Thallium,
Both websites are interesting point of views on Mathematics, 50 years from now (the year 2050). 
I noticed that. I have not immersed in it so well yet. I'll get back to you when I have had a better look.

All times are GMT 5. The time now is 12:11 PM. 
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000  2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014 Physics Forums