Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for a photonics engineer considering whether to pursue a PhD in Computational Science with a concentration in Computational Physics at George Mason University or to seek a PhD in Physics at another institution after completing an MS. The conversation touches on career implications, the importance of the specific degree, and personal interests in computational versus traditional physics.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses uncertainty about whether to continue at GMU for both the MS and PhD or to switch schools for a PhD in Physics, highlighting the lack of a Physics PhD at GMU.
- Another participant suggests that the decision is highly personal and depends on the individual's career goals, questioning the relevance of specific qualifications for job prospects.
- A further contribution recalls advice from a professor indicating that the field of the PhD may be less important than the actions taken post-PhD, raising concerns about hiring and employment implications of a degree in Computational Sciences versus Physics.
- One participant questions the individual's interest in computational physics, suggesting that if the focus is not on computational work, pursuing a traditional physics program may be more beneficial.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the importance of the specific degree versus the experiences gained during and after the program. There is no consensus on whether a PhD in Computational Science is as valuable as a PhD in Physics for career advancement.
Contextual Notes
The discussion reflects varying assumptions about the relevance of degree titles in the job market and the personal motivations for pursuing a PhD, which may not be fully articulated by all participants.