How should we retire the Hubble?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phobos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hubble
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the future of the Hubble Space Telescope once its performance period concludes. Participants explore various options for its retirement, including retrieval, repurposing, and disposal methods, while considering the associated costs and implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest creating a special re-entry vehicle to safely retrieve Hubble for display, while others question the risk and feasibility of such a mission.
  • There are inquiries about the yearly maintenance costs of Hubble and the potential for selling it to another space consortium.
  • One participant humorously proposes sending Hubble into the sun as a disposal method.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes the significance of Hubble as a technological achievement deserving of a museum display, contrasting with the idea of prioritizing funding for other NASA projects over sentimental gestures.
  • Some participants express support for sticking with the original plan to retrieve Hubble, while others advocate for more practical uses of the funds involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on how to retire Hubble, with no clear consensus on the best approach. Some favor retrieval for display, while others propose disposal or repurposing, indicating ongoing disagreement.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention costs associated with maintenance and retrieval, but specific figures and assumptions regarding these costs remain unclear. The discussion also reflects varying sentiments about the value of Hubble as a scientific instrument versus its cultural significance.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those involved in space exploration, aerospace engineering, or the history of scientific achievements, as well as individuals curious about the future of significant space missions.

How should we retire the Hubble?

  • Stick with the original plan & send up a shuttle.

    Votes: 5 50.0%
  • Keep it in orbit (maintenance missions).

    Votes: 3 30.0%
  • Let it burn up in the atmosphere.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other,

    Votes: 2 20.0%

  • Total voters
    10
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
7
I heard this question on a radio talk show.

The original plan was to send up another shuttle mission to retrieve the Hubble so that it could be displayed in the Smithsonian Musuem. But with the Challanger and Columbia accidents behind us, do you think the risk is worth it? What should be done once the Hubble's performance period is over (a few years from now)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think we should make a special re-entry vehicle that we can use to bring things back and make sure it's large enough to handle the Hubble. We could also use it to return other payloads for refurbishing.
 
Erm... does anyone have figures on how much yearly maintenance of Hubble costs?

Maybe it can just be sold to another space consortium.
 
Send it glorously into the sun!
 
Originally posted by FZ+
Erm... does anyone have figures on how much yearly maintenance of Hubble costs?
Or how much it costs to bring it back to earth? (about half a billion).
 
Originally posted by Phobos
What should be done once the Hubble's performance period is over (a few years from now)?

Just before it's "performance" period is over, attempt to make little telescope babies by flying Hubble straight into the giant radio telescope at arecibo chile.
 
Last edited:
That was funny.

But humor aside, the Hubble is actually a piece of technology that stands out among all time human accomplishments. It's a statement about the progress of the entire human race. If anything deserves to be in a museum, the Hubble is it.
 
Seriously though, if it costs that much, it is more worthwhile spending the cash where it is really needed - other NASA projects, than on little moments of sentimentality. That would be a better celebration of what the telescope acheived. It's just a machine for god's sake...
 
I think they should stick with the original plan.
 
  • #10
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Send it glorously into the sun!

My thoughts entirely. :)
 
  • #11
I think they should give it to me.. it will be much better than my 8 inch dob
 
  • #12
CNN finally picked up on the topic...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/08/15/hubble.reut/index.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
507K