Unraveling the Mysteries of Black Holes: Finite or Infinite Mass?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes, specifically questioning whether they possess finite or infinite mass. Participants explore various aspects of black hole formation, mass estimation, and related physical principles, including gravitational forces and Hawking radiation. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and speculative ideas regarding the dimensionality of black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether black holes have finite or infinite mass, suggesting that if they had infinite mass, the gravitational force would also be infinite.
  • Another participant asserts that the mass of a black hole is finite.
  • A participant inquires about methods to determine the mass of a black hole, mentioning a belief that it is roughly equal to the mass of the star from which it formed.
  • Discussion includes the idea that a star must exceed a certain mass to become a black hole, with a participant elaborating on the dynamics of star collapse.
  • One participant states that a black hole forms when matter reaches a density where escape velocity exceeds the speed of light, and mentions that black holes can lose mass through Hawking radiation.
  • A later reply discusses the approximation of energy loss due to Hawking radiation, noting that the rate is very small and provides a rough estimate for the evaporation time of a black hole with solar mass.
  • Another participant raises a question about the relationship between escape velocity and the mass of light, leading to a clarification that photons are massless but possess momentum.
  • A participant asks whether black holes are three-dimensional, to which another responds that they are typically considered four-dimensional but acknowledges theories suggesting additional dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of black holes, particularly regarding their mass and dimensionality. While some points, such as the finite mass of black holes, are asserted, other aspects remain contested or speculative, indicating no consensus on several issues discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the relationship between a star's mass and the resulting black hole, as well as the implications of Hawking radiation on black hole mass. There are unresolved questions regarding the exact mechanisms of black hole formation and the dimensionality of black holes.

Ryosuke
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Here's another one of my stupid ideas :-p


First question, do black holes have a finite mass or an infinite mass?

If they have a finite mass, disreguard everything i write below.


Now if they have infinite mass, the gravitational formula is:

Gravitational force = (G * m1 * m2) / (d2)

so, blah blah blah, it would mean the gravitational force of the black hole was infinite too, which couldn't be true, could it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The mass of a black hole is finite.
 
ah, well that answers that

should teach me to pay more attention
 
Is there any way of knowing the mass?? I thing I read somewhere (I may be wrong) that the mass (and gravity) of a black hole is roughly equal to that of the star before it turned into a black hole. Is this correct?
 
In order for a star to turn into a black hole, its mass must exceed some value (which I don't know).
To go out on a limb here (I don't know much about this, either), the basic dynamics for the formation of a black hole is that through burn-off of its matter, the star reaches a point where it cannot generate the necessary pressure to prevent the collapse of its form into a black hole.
(The gravitational force on an element of the star is directed inwards to the center, hence all elements would speed inwards to the center unless a sufficient pressure kept them from doing so..).
 
Well its about greater than 30 times the mass of the Sun that a black hole forms. A black hole is formed when matter achieves a density such that the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light. We can only know exactly 3 quantities of a black hole namely the mass, charge and angular momentum...all other information of what made it up is lost (related to entropy...but that's a whole other long and complex story!)
As for the mass query it is NOT constant...Hawking found that black holes can lose energy, by particles escaping. Particle-antiparticle pairs can be formed at the event horizon by energy from the gravitational field, if one of the pair falls into the black hole the other continues until infinity, i.e carrying energy away from the black hole-this is known as Hawking Radiation.
Hope this helps

Ray
 
rayveldkamp:
Do we have, as yet, any estimate of the rate of energy loss of the black hole due to Hawking radiation other than that it is probably non-zero?
 
The answer is not exactly, but we can make a very good approximation. We currently have no quantum theory of gravity, but we do for the other fundamental interactions, so to explain black holes we use the quantum theories of these three, but use Einstein's General Relativity (a CLASSICAL theory) to account for gravity...this is OK because the quantum gravity effects only take place on very very small scales, namely the Planck length 10^-35m

At any instant the energy of the black hole is given by E=mc^2. A rather crude approximation is to equate the derivative of this to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and after a little integration we get the result that for a black hole the same mass as our Sun it would take 10^66 years to completely evapourate.
So the answer to your question is a VERY small rate of energy loss, however the amazing result is that there is an "evapouration" of black holes.
 
but if light has an escape velocity, wouln't that mean that it also has mass?, for example you have to be going faster than 9.8 to escape earth, and the more massive the object, the more energy you need to reach this.
 
  • #10
No, in the quantum model light consists of photons which are massless particles, but do exhibit wave-like phenomena (eg light diffraction, reflection etc), nonetheless light is particle in nature. Photons, although having no mass, do have a momentum, this is why light has an escape velocity.
Since the photon is massless it must travel at the speed of light c, and hence it is a relativistic particle and cannot be treated with the usual methods. The energy is given by:
E^2=p^2 c^2 +m^2c^4 where p is its momentum and c is its REST MASS.
Hence for a photon (or any massless particle) E=pc

Hope this helps
Ray
 
  • #11
is black hole 3 dimensional ?
 
  • #12
ahhh its hard to say, on the basis of our everyday space-time we would say it is 4 dimensional (3 space + 1 time), however many theories, for example some superstrings and M-theory predict the universe consists of many more dimensions than just 4. So the answer is simple...we don't know!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K