Why Are TV Tuner Cards Priced Over $50?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pricing of TV tuner cards, exploring factors that contribute to their cost, the quality of picture output, and the availability of related devices for audio and video playback. Participants also touch on the functionality and performance of these cards in comparison to other hardware components.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why TV tuner cards are priced over $50, suggesting that while some can be found for less, the overall cost is influenced by the complexity of the circuitry and the features offered.
  • Others argue that the quality of the display is largely determined by the TV tuner card itself, emphasizing the importance of processing speed and memory, while also noting the necessity of a good antenna.
  • There is a discussion about the specifications of capture cards, with some participants mentioning technical aspects like video AD converters and recording format limitations.
  • Some participants inquire about the existence of music and video tape readers for PCs, with responses indicating that traditional tape players are needed to connect to a computer's sound card for audio conversion.
  • There are questions regarding the availability of internal tape drivers and the compatibility of common audio and video tapes with data tape drives.
  • Some participants reflect on the historical use of audio cassettes for data storage in early computers, while others express skepticism about the practicality of introducing modern digital interfaces for obsolete formats.
  • One participant shares their experience of returning a TV tuner card due to dissatisfaction with the viewing experience on a PC, while another mentions the interference issues caused by EMF noise within the computer case.
  • There is mention of the lack of AGP interface TV tuner cards, with a belief that such a card would enhance streaming video capabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the pricing and functionality of TV tuner cards, with no clear consensus on the reasons for their cost or the effectiveness of various models. The discussion includes both support for and skepticism about the relevance of older audio and video formats in modern computing.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the capabilities of TV tuner cards, the quality of signal processing, and the historical context of audio tape usage, which remain unresolved throughout the discussion.

Saint
Messages
438
Reaction score
0
Why it is so expensive?
>50USD.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
ETV 203 Studio: 31.9Euro
It captures FM-Radio, and TV/Video, in MPEGII. With remote control.
Of course there may be more expensive TV tuner cards depending on signal processing speed, memory and supported formats. They aren't much expensive, it's a whole circuitry that has to process various forms of signals + other devices like remote control. At least they are no more expensive than graphic cards.
 
what will determine a very good picture quality on your monitor?
 
I think that in the context of TV tuners the quality of display will depend almost entirely on the TV tuner card (processing speed and memory). These cards bypass the graphic card capabilities. Of course you'll need to have a good antenna for a good display :)
 
Why it is so expensive?
>50USD.
They can sometimes be purchased for <50USD. Here is a good place to learn more;

http://computers.listings.ebay.com/...ListQQsosortorderZ1QQsosortpropertyZ1QQsotrZ2

what will determine a very good picture quality on your monitor?
The capture card specs may be not as good on some as others but this will get you into technical mumbo-jumbo you may be unfamiliar with (such as a 10-bit video AD converter, etc). Another thing to consider is how restricted you will be with regard to recording formats. Should an inexpensive card, for example, allow only for capturing with VCD you would be at a disadvantage…

At any rate, a good rule of thumb is to use high resolutions while ‘throwing’ a lot of bits at it too. If you have captured the video as MPEG2 it can be quite large and if using DV it can be tremendous in size. In either case following capture you might consider transcoding the file to something such as the variable bitrate, noncompliant VCD. This will leave you with a smaller file size yet retain a respectable degree of detail with an added bonus of being compatible with certain standalone DVD players (should you burn it to a CD or DVD).
 
Question

I was wondering if there are music and video tape readers for PCs in the market. What are the prices, because I've not encountered any?
 
ramollari said:
I was wondering if there are music and video tape readers for PCs in the market. What are the prices, because I've not encountered any?
You won't find a tape player with a USB port, for example - you need to output it to an input device on the pc (the sound card). Same goes for video.
 
russ_watters said:
you need to output it to an input device on the pc (the sound card).
How is that done?

Aren't there tape drivers for the IDE bus? I mean, any internal tape drivers?
 
How analog-to-digital audio conversion works

ramollari said:
How is that done?
It is done with ADCs (Analog to Digital Converters). An ADC is a component which converts analog signals to digital information. An audio CD player has DACs in it (Digital to Analog Converters). A computer sound card that both inputs analog sound and outputs analog sound is equipped with both ADCs and DACs.

More here:
http://stuffo.howstuffworks.com/analog-digital3.htm



Aren't there tape drivers for the IDE bus? I mean, any internal tape drivers?
Audio tape players/recorders are not data tape drives. There may be device drivers that work with data tape drives. In Linux, one can mount tape drives using the mount command, so I would assume that Linux at least has data tape drive drivers. If you are trying to convert audio tapes to digital, I would assume you might just plug the analog audio outputs of the tape deck into the analog audio inputs on the sound card and cue up the tape and then simultaneously press play on the tape deck and record on the computer.
 
  • #10
Well, what about data tape drives? Are there any available? Do the common audio and video tapes fit into those drives?
 
  • #11
Using ordinary audio cassette tapes to store computer data

ramollari said:
Well, what about data tape drives? Are there any available
Newegg.com has 49 tape drives for sale under the classification of backup devices:
http://www.newegg.com/app/manufact.asp?catalog=46&DEPA=0



Do the common audio and video tapes fit into those drives?
I don't think they do. They seem to use special tape cartridges. The early-1980's computer called the "Apple II" had digital inputs and outputs for accepting program data from, and recording program data to, ordinary audio cassette recorders, but it did not have an interface to allow the computer to control the motors of the tape deck (e.g., "play" and "record" had to be pressed manually on the tape deck). I believe other early desktop computers such as the Vic 20 and the TRS-80 also had the capability to use ordinary audio cassette tapes for data storage/playback.

The old IBM mainframe computers that used tape drives under direct and active computer control appear to me to have used either ordinary audio reel-to-reel audio tape or something very similar:
http://www.computersciencelab.com/ComputerHistory/HtmlHelp/Images/IBM7094.jpg
 
  • #12
Indeed I know that tape drives have been in existence even before hard and floppy disks existed, with the first IBM mainframes. If it is the case that common audio or video casette drives have not been introduced in the market, it would be a good opportunity for vendors to introduce them.
 
  • #13
ramollari said:
How is that done?

Aren't there tape drivers for the IDE bus? I mean, any internal tape drivers?
What I said was there are no tape players for computers: you use an ordinary tape player and plug the line-out on the tape player into the line-in on your sound card. Same goes for video: use the rca or s-video.
If it is the case that common audio or video casette drives have not been introduced in the market, it would be a good opportunity for vendors to introduce them.
No, audio cassettes have been obsolete for a decade and its pointless to make a digital interface for one.
 
  • #14
I returned the card back to the shop,
it is not nice to watch TV with PC.
I echange the card with a AGP graphic card,128MB.
 
  • #15
russ_watters said:
No, audio cassettes have been obsolete for a decade and its pointless to make a digital interface for one.
I'd be more than satisfied if I converted my dozens of old audio casettes to digital. They would not wear out any more and would be better to use as CDs. The same is the case with video tapes which still dominate in film rental stores.
 
  • #16
ramollari said:
russ_watters said:
audio cassettes have been obsolete for a decade and its pointless to make a digital interface for one.
I'd be more than satisfied if I converted my dozens of old audio casettes to digital.
You may play them into your computer and record them digitally to your hard drive. The ADCs in the computer's sound card should convert the analog audio signals to digital data.
 
  • #17
ramollari said:
I'd be more than satisfied if I converted my dozens of old audio casettes to digital. They would not wear out any more and would be better to use as CDs. The same is the case with video tapes which still dominate in film rental stores.
What I've been trying to tell you is you can easily do just that using any tape player and the hardware that's already on your computer. I'm transfering my VHS to DVD...
 
  • #18
Saint said:
I returned the card back to the shop,
it is not nice to watch TV with PC.
I echange the card with a AGP graphic card,128MB.
I like mine, but one problem is that reception isn't all that great - computer tv tuners don't have amplifiers and the EMF noise inside the case interferes with the signal. Some people use a separate tuner (like in a VCR) and an s-video input. I don't, but I've tried it and the picture is much better.
 
  • #19
By the way I haven't encountered TV-tuner cards with interface for AGP bus. Most are for PCI interface. I believe that a TV tuner with AGP8X interface would be more nice to support streaming video.
 
  • #20
ramollari said:
By the way I haven't encountered TV-tuner cards with interface for AGP bus. Most are for PCI interface. I believe that a TV tuner with AGP8X interface would be more nice to support streaming video.
A TV tuner on a multi-function card like an ATI All-In-Wonder is AGP (I have one). For tv capture functions, it doesn't matter much though - PCI has plenty of bandwidth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
13K