Puzzling Question about Rotation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spamkod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether a person can turn 180 degrees while standing on an absolutely frictionless surface, considering the effects of air friction and the possibility of jumping and spinning in the air. Various scenarios and mechanisms for achieving this rotation are explored.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a person can rotate their body by moving their arms in a circular motion, which would change their angular orientation while conserving angular momentum.
  • Others argue that a person is a single rigid body and cannot reorient themselves in space without external forces, challenging the idea of using limbs to induce rotation.
  • A participant mentions the "falling cat problem" as a relevant analogy, where a cat can change its orientation mid-air by manipulating its body segments.
  • Another participant proposes that a person could expel air forcefully to induce rotation, suggesting unconventional methods of achieving the turn.
  • Some participants provide examples from physics demonstrations, such as using a bicycle wheel while sitting on a frictionless stool to illustrate conservation of angular momentum.
  • There is mention of astronauts using similar techniques in weightless conditions to reorient themselves, drawing parallels to the discussed scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of turning 180 degrees on a frictionless surface, with no consensus reached. Some believe it is possible through specific movements, while others maintain that the constraints of a frictionless environment prevent such rotation.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of the body as a rigid entity versus a collection of segments, as well as the effects of air friction being considered negligible in some scenarios.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying physics, particularly in areas related to mechanics, angular momentum, and dynamics, as well as individuals curious about practical applications in astronautics and biomechanics.

spamkod
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to turn 180 degree for a person who is standing on a absolutely frictionless surface? Air friction is supposed to present. The person can jump vertically and spin in air.thats one possible scenario. Are there any others??
Also if air friction is neglible is it possible to turn 180 degree?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Ignoring the air and assuming a frictionless surface, angular momentum (in this case zero) is maintained, so a person can rotate their arms in a circle over their head, moving their arms clockwise to turn their body counter-clockwise or vice versa, to change the angular orientation.
 


yeah, absolutely angular momentum would be conserved. But arms and feet are'nt two separate entities.They belong to the same entity-body.
 


Feeling a bit difficult to visualise the situation.
 


A cat can change it's orientation by bending at the middle, and whirling it's front and back body havles to rotate 180 degrees from inverted and land on it's feet. Link to youtube videos:



 
Last edited by a moderator:


He may be able to turn his head at an angle and expel air forcefully to induce a jet-propelled rotation. Or he could empty his bladder tangentially ...
 
Last edited:


spamkod said:
yeah, absolutely angular momentum would be conserved. But arms and feet are'nt two separate entities.They belong to the same entity-body.

But you are free to orient your limbs relative to your torso. It's only a single rigid body that cannot reorient itself in space.

For visualisation:
Take a cylinder shaped satellite, in orbit. Inside the cylinder, at the center of mass, there is a disk, with the axis paralllel to the axis of the cylinder. Let's say that disk's mass is 1/100th of the satellites' mass.

Spin up the disk. Spinning up the disk causes the satellite to counter-rotate around its axis, but slower than the disk, as the satellite is heavier. After the satellite has rotated 180 degrees spin the disk down again.


I assume astrounauts in weightless conditions do something like that. They will windmill one or both arms to reorient themselves.
 


That was seriously awesome that i learned from the posts. Thanks guys.
 
Cleonis said:
I assume astrounauts in weightless conditions do something like that. They will windmill one or both arms to reorient themselves.
Yes or swing around the legs. See this video at 25:00 for a demonstration in the skylab:
http://techtv.mit.edu/collections/l...cle-smarts-stability-translation-and-rotation

They also can do what the cat does. They did some research on this in the 60's for the space program:
http://www.theatlantic.com/video/archive/2011/09/can-an-astronaut-move-like-a-falling-cat/244829/
 
  • #10


spamkod said:
Is it possible to turn 180 degree for a person who is standing on a absolutely frictionless surface? Air friction is supposed to present. The person can jump vertically and spin in air.thats one possible scenario. Are there any others??
Also if air friction is neglible is it possible to turn 180 degree?
In order to "spin in air" the person would have to have to have applied a rotary force before jumping. And he could not do that on a frictionless subject.
 
  • #11


HallsofIvy said:
In order to "spin in air" the person would have to have to have applied a rotary force before jumping. And he could not do that on a frictionless subject.
Nope. You're thinking of a person as a rigid body. People have arms, legs, and a waist. This is a vertical analogy of the "falling cat problem". Some journal articles about this problem: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=falling+cat+problem.
 
  • #12


NascentOxygen said:
He may be able to turn his head at an angle and expel air forcefully to induce a jet-propelled rotation. Or he could empty his bladder tangentially ...

This.

:smile:
HallsofIvy said:
In order to "spin in air" the person would have to have to have applied a rotary force before jumping. And he could not do that on a frictionless subject.

I think he can. That's how falling cats work, I suppose.Edit : Oh, DH added an article too.. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #13


Another example, which I've done many times as a classroom demonstration: Sit on a frictionless rotating stool while holding a bicycle wheel horizontally. Everything is initally stationary. With one hand, start the wheel rotating clockwise. You and the stool start to rotate counterclockwise in order to conserve total angular momentum. When you've rotated 180 degrees, stop the spinning wheel. You stop too, in your new orientation.

It doesn't even have to be a wheel. You can hold an object in your hands, out in front of you, and move it around in a horizontal clockwise circular motion. Same result.
 
  • #14


Infinitum said:
I think he can. That's how falling cats work, I suppose.

Edit : Oh, DH added an article too.. :smile:
And here's a graphic:

tumblr_lurmysW0QC1r1w416o1_500.png


This image is from TR Kane's and MP Scher's seminal paper on the subject, A dynamical explanation of the falling cat phenomenon. Thomas R. Kane is no slouch. Study robotics and you will inevitably learn about Kanes' dynamics equations. He is in a sense the father of modern robotics.
 
  • #15


D H said:
And here's a graphic:

tumblr_lurmysW0QC1r1w416o1_500.png


This image is from TR Kane's and MP Scher's seminal paper on the subject, A dynamical explanation of the falling cat phenomenon. Thomas R. Kane is no slouch. Study robotics and you will inevitably learn about Kanes' dynamics equations. He is in a sense the father of modern robotics.

This is Kane's two-parts-cat model animated:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGusK69XVlk

A human standing on frictionless surface could try the same (basically a hula hoop swing), but would probably fall over. Swinging arms seems better here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
7K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K