Showing that the Virial Theorem holds

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Virial theorem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Virial Theorem in the context of hydrogenic atoms, specifically focusing on the calculation of expectation values for kinetic and potential energy operators. Participants explore the relationship between these energies and their implications for the theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the expectation value of the interaction potential for hydrogenic atoms and seeks assistance in calculating the expectation value of the kinetic energy operator.
  • Another participant suggests a method to find the expectation value of the kinetic energy term by integrating the differential operator for momentum within the context of function space.
  • A third participant outlines a series of equations relating the Hamiltonian, total energy, potential energy, and kinetic energy, indicating a method to compute the kinetic energy expectation value using the Hamiltonian.
  • One participant notes a discrepancy in their textbook regarding the inclusion of a term in the denominator and expresses gratitude for the assistance received.
  • Another participant explains that the missing term may be due to the use of the cgs unit system, which affects the formulation of Coulomb's law.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and clarity regarding the calculations involved, with some acknowledging confusion while others provide solutions. There is no consensus on the resolution of the textbook discrepancy.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific equations and terms that may depend on particular definitions or unit systems, which could affect the calculations and interpretations discussed.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
So I have already calculated correctly that the expectation of the interaction potential for hydrogenic atoms is

<nlm|V(r)|nlm>=-(uZ^2e^4)/((hbar^2)*n^2)

Note that u= mass,and V(r)=-Ze^2/r

I now have to calculate <nlm|T|nlm> where T is the kinetic energy operator, and

T=p^2/(2u) + L^2/(2ur^2)

Note that p is the radial momentum operator and L is the angular momentum operator

I know hbar^2l(l+1)=L^2 and I know (pretty sure) that <1/r^2>=e^2/(2n^3hbar^2).

However, I am unsure how to find the expectation value of the p^2/(2u) term, and don't see how <T> is going to equal <V> which the book hints at being true since <T> and <V> are said to satisfy the Virial Theorem.

Help anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ed Quanta said:
However, I am unsure how to find the expectation value of the p^2/(2u) term,

You can do it by brute force (that's what I call working in function space). Insert the differential operator for p into the expression for T, sandwich it between &psi;n'l'm'* and &psi;nlm, and integrate.
 
There's a piece of genius on my behalf:

[tex]\hat{H}=\hat{T}+\hat{V}[/tex] (1)

[tex]\langle nlm|\hat{H}|nlm\rangle = E_{n} =-\frac{Z^{2}\mu e^{4}}{2\hbar^{2}(4\pi\epsilon_{0})} \frac{1}{n^{2}}[/tex] (2)

[tex]\langle nlm|\hat{V}|nlm\rangle =-\frac{Ze^{2}}{(4\pi\epsilon_{0})}\langle \frac{1}{r}\rangle _{|nlm\rangle}[/tex] (3)

Compute (3) using the average of 1/r.

Then:

[tex]\langle nlm|\hat{T}|nlm\rangle =\langle nlm|\hat{H}-\hat{V}|nlm\rangle=E_{n}+\frac{Ze^{2}}{(4\pi\epsilon_{0})}\langle \frac{1}{r}\rangle _{|nlm\rangle}[/tex] (4)

Tell where u get stuck.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
My book seems to leave out the 4pi*epsilon term in the denominator for some reason. But yeah thanks, I am cool now. I was missing the expectation value for the Hamiltonian. Thanks for your genius my man.
 
Ed Quanta said:
My book seems to leave out the 4pi*epsilon term in the denominator for some reason. But yeah thanks, I am cool now. I was missing the expectation value for the Hamiltonian. Thanks for your genius my man.

It must use the cgs unit system.. in cgs a factor of [tex]( 4 \pi \epsilon_0 )^{\frac{1}2}[/tex] is "absorbed" into the unit of charge, so that Coulomb's law can be written as [tex]\vec{F} = \frac{e^2}{r^2}\hat{r}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K