Physics Forums

Physics Forums (http://www.physicsforums.com/index.php)
-   Classical Physics (http://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Question about phase constant (http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=666068)

Sciencer Jan22-13 02:46 PM

Question about phase constant
 
we have the wave equation as follows with non zero phase constant:


y(x,t) = ym * sin(k( x - PHI/k) - wt)
or

y(x,t) = ym * sin(kx - w(t + PHI / w))

I don't understand where did the PHI /k or PHI / w came from ??

I understand how did we derive the wave equation but I don't understand this part.

yungman Jan22-13 02:53 PM

Re: Question about phase constant
 
Quote:

Quote by Sciencer (Post 4238691)
we have the wave equation as follows with non zero phase constant:


y(x,t) = ym * sin(k( x - PHI/k) - wt)
or

y(x,t) = ym * sin(kx - w(t + PHI / w))

I don't understand where did the PHI /k or PHI / w came from ??

I understand how did we derive the wave equation but I don't understand this part.

You just substitute in and both equation are the same.

But the more basic thing is, I never seen any book write it this way, that is very confusing. The three terms are totally independent. [itex]\omega t[/itex] is the time dependent, kx is distance dependent, and [itex] \phi[/itex] is a phase constant. You don't confuse this more by mixing them together as if they are related.

People usually set either t=0 or x=0 as a reference and generate two separate equations that relate t or x with [itex]\phi[/itex]. With this, you can generate two separate graphs of (y vs t) or (y vs x).

Sciencer Jan22-13 03:10 PM

Re: Question about phase constant
 
I see but what is then the reason for putting it in this form? What is the logic behind it ?

yungman Jan22-13 04:10 PM

Re: Question about phase constant
 
I don't see the logic and I never seen any book that presented it this way. I disagree with the book. In fact, I am at this very moment doing a lot of digging and asking questions regarding to these very kind of phasing issue with respect to direction of propagation, been searching through a lot of books and no body tries to put the equation like this way.......as if it is not confused enough dealing with phase constant with respects to t and x alone.

andrien Jan23-13 01:18 AM

Re: Question about phase constant
 
Quote:

I don't understand where did the PHI /k or PHI / w came from ??
they just come from simple manipulation,there is nothing special about it.Don't break your head on this.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014 Physics Forums