Physics Forums

Physics Forums (http://www.physicsforums.com/index.php)
-   Classical Physics (http://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Supersonic ping pong ball cannon (http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=671523)

voko Feb13-13 05:31 AM

Supersonic ping pong ball cannon
 
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9zBGgpzl0I

Description: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1301/1301.5188.pdf

So I though I would do a back-of-envelope check if that was even possible. I decided to model that as adiabatic expansion from the pressure plenum into the barrel, ignoring any effect the nozzle could make.

So ##p_i V_i^{\gamma} = p_f V_f^{\gamma}##, yielding ## p_f = p_i (\frac {V_i} {V_f})^{\gamma} ##. Then, the internal energy is ## U = \hat{c}_V n R T = \hat{c}_V p V ##, so ## U_i - U_f = \hat{c}_V (p_i V_i - p_f V_f) = \hat{c}_V (p_i V_i - p_i (\frac {V_i} {V_f})^{\gamma} V_f) = \hat{c}_V p_i V_i (1 - (\frac {V_i} {V_f})^{\gamma - 1}) ##.

From the dimensions given I computed ## V_i = 0.0042 m^3, \ V_f = (0.0042 + 0.0028) = 0.007 m^3 ##; two pressure values were mentioned, so I took ## p_i = 500 kPa ##. I assumed air is a diatomic ideal gas, so ## \gamma = 7/5, \hat{c}_V = 5/2 ##, so the final result is ## U_i - U_f = 970 J ##.

Then the mass of the ping pong ball is 2.7 g, the reported speed was 406.4 m/s, thus its kinetic energy was 223 J, which is quite a bit less than the diff in the air's internal energy, which makes the whole thing plausible - at least in this model.

Now, my question is, is there any obvious problem with the model and, perhaps, the computation? How would one model the effect of the nozzle?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014 Physics Forums