Brian greene on letterman last night

  • Thread starter Thread starter eigenguy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Brian Greene's recent appearance on a talk show, focusing on his contributions to physics, particularly M-Theory, and the public's perception of his work. Participants express their thoughts on the significance of his recognition and the content typically shared during such appearances.

Discussion Character

  • Meta-discussion, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the content of Brian Greene's appearance, noting they missed the show.
  • Others suggest that Greene often reiterates the concept that different particles are strings vibrating at various frequencies, implying a lack of new information in his appearances.
  • There is a sentiment that Greene's recognition on a popular platform is beneficial for raising awareness of M-Theory.
  • One participant emphasizes that Greene's visibility not only highlights his work but also brings attention to M-Theory itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the positive impact of Greene's recognition, but there is no consensus on the specific content of his appearance or its novelty.

eigenguy
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I missed it. What did he say?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I also missed it, but the only thing he ever says on these shows is something like "different particles are actually strings that vibrate at different frequencies" and that's usually it so you probably didn't miss much.
 
Nice to see him get some recognition from such a popular audience.
 
Originally posted by Greg Bernhardt
Nice to see him get some recognition from such a popular audience.

I agree, it not only gives him well-deserved recognition, but it also gives M-Theory its well-deserved recognition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K