Solving Math Problems: Selecting 7 Out of 16 Seated Men on a Round Table

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wiz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the combinatorial problem of selecting 7 out of 16 seated men at a round table, ensuring that no two selected individuals are adjacent. Participants explore different methods and approaches to solve this problem, including variations in the number of selections and the implications of seating arrangements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the initial problem of selecting 7 men from 16 seated at a round table with the condition that no two selected men are adjacent.
  • Another participant questions how the problem changes if 8 men are selected instead and seeks clarification on fundamentally different selection methods.
  • A participant proposes a method involving gaps between selected individuals and outlines two cases for distributing remaining individuals over these gaps.
  • There is a correction regarding the initial calculation of possible selections, leading to a revised total of 64 selections based on the arrangement of gaps.
  • A later reply introduces a matrix-based approach to generalize the problem for selecting r persons from n, including a formula that involves calculating gaps and selections.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the matrix method and requests further explanation of the proposed approach.
  • Another participant elaborates on the matrix definition and the calculation process, reiterating the conditions for selection and providing a detailed breakdown of the method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to solve the problem, and there are multiple competing views and approaches presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the arrangement of individuals and the implications of selecting different numbers of participants. Some methods proposed may depend on specific interpretations of the problem's conditions.

Wiz
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am stuck on this prob...16 men are seated along a round table...in how many ways can i select 7 out of em such tht none of the selected individual were sitting next to each other?...
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In how many ways could you select 8 men? In how many fundamentally different ways (that is, without being able to rotate/flip one into another)can you select 7 men?
 
i don't get u...wht are u trying to say??.are u challenging the question or asking me a question which i myself posted on the forum?...what??
 
Hmmm...I was trying to be pedagogical. See if I could point you in the right direction by asking some slightly different questions, rather than just stating the solution.

Another try: We have to select 7 persons with gaps (of at least one person) between them. This is equivalent to selecting 7 gaps (of at least one person) with exactly one person in between. Now, in how many ways can you distribute the remaining 9 persons over the 7 gaps? We've got two different cases:

(1) We've got a gap of three persons, like: #000#0#0#0#0#0#0 (where # denotes selected). In how many ways can you do this?

(2) We've got two gaps of two persons, like: #00#00#0#0#0#0#0. In how many ways can you do this?
 
By the way: I get 14 + 42 = 56 possible ways.
 
hmm...i get ur method..but ur ans is wrong..check it again..in the meanwhile i'll give it another shot..do post ur corrected ans...thanks.
 
Oh yes, I see, I made a mistake.

(1) In this case the selection is characterized by the position (of the middle person) of the gap of three. So there are 16 different possible selections.

(2) Now the selection is characterized by the position of the two gaps of two persons. The 'first' gap (of two) can be chosen arbitrary, so 16 possibilities. The second gap (of two) can be chosen from the 7-1=6 remaining gaps between selected persons. Now we have to divide by two because the gaps (of two) could interchanged to yield the same selection. So we get 16 x 6 / 2 = 48 possible selections.

Conclusion there are 64 possible selections.
 
ok thtz correct...but is there a way to generalise it??...say selection of r persons out of n ppl??.(in the same prob)
 
First, build a matrix like
[tex]A = \left[ \begin{array}{ccccc} a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} & a_{14} & . . . \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} & a_{24} & . . . \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} & a_{34} & . . . \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & . . . \end{array} \right][/tex]
Where [tex]a_{1j} = 1[/tex] and [tex]a_{n1} = 1[/tex], and define : [tex]a_{ij} = a_{(i - 1)j} + a_{i(j - 1)}[/tex]
Your matrix will look like:
[tex]A = \left[ \begin{array}{ccccc} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & . . . \\ 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & . . . \\ 1 & 3 & 6 & 10 & . . . \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & . . . \end{array} \right][/tex]
Problem: n people in a round table. No 2 selected people sits next to each other. Select p people.
Calculate: [tex]\delta = n - (2(p - 1) + 1)[/tex]. Then the total number of ways is :
[tex]C = a_{\delta p} + \sum_{x = 1}^{\delta} a_{xp}[/tex]
I wonder if anyone has discovered this. Anyway, if no one else has. Let’s call it ‘The little theorem of Viet Dao’. :wink:
EDIT : This formula can be horribly wrong if there is no way to select.
Viet Dao,
 
Last edited:
  • #10
i understood absolutely nothing in ur previous post...could u please explain??...
 
  • #11
Okay, a matrix m x n is defined as:
[tex]A_{m x n} = \left[ \begin{array}{ccccc} a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} & . . . & a_{1n} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} & . . . & a_{2n} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & . . . \\ a_{m1} & a_{m2} & a_{m3} & . . . & a_{mn} \end{array} \right][/tex]
[tex]a_{ij}[/tex] 0 < i < m, 0 < j < n is one item in the matrix. For example, i = 1, j = 1, then you will have [tex]a_{ij} = a_{11}[/tex]
And my matrix will have [tex]a_{1j} = 1 \mbox{ and } a_{i1} = 1[/tex]
So it will look like:
An item [tex]a_{ij}[/tex] is the one that lies on the i row, and the j column of the matrix.
[tex]A = \left[ \begin{array}{ccccc} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & . . . \\ 1 & a_{22} & a_{23} & a_{24} & . . . \\ 1 & a_{32} & a_{33} & a_{34} & . . . \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & . . . \end{array} \right][/tex]
Then I say : [tex]a_{ij} = a_{(i - 1)j} + a_{i(j - 1)}[/tex]
Example : [tex]a_{22} = a_{12} + a_{21} = 1 + 1 = 2[/tex]
[tex]a_{23} = a_{13} + a_{22} = 1 + 2 = 3[/tex]
The item [tex]a_{ij}[/tex] is the sum of the item above it and the item to the left of it.
And so on, so my matrix will look like:
[tex]A = \left[ \begin{array}{ccccc} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & . . . \\ 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & . . . \\ 1 & 3 & 6 & 10 & . . . \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & . . . \end{array} \right][/tex]
Then I calculate : [tex]\delta = n - (2(p - 1) + 1)[/tex]. There are 2 cases:
1. [tex]\delta \leq 0[/tex] : No selection.
2. [tex]\delta > 0[/tex]:
Then the number of selection will be:
[tex]C = a_{\delta p} + \sum_{x = 1}^{\delta} a_{xp}[/tex]
It means:
[tex]C = a_{\delta p} + a_{1p} + a_{2p} + a_{3p} + ... + a_{\delta p}[/tex]
Where p is the number of people you want to select, n is the total number of people sitting on the round table.
* Solving your problem using my method:
[tex]\delta = n - (2(p - 1) + 1) = 3[/tex]
p = 7, n = 16 (This is what you have total people = 16, number of selected people = 7).
[tex]A = \left[ \begin{array}{ccccccc} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1. . . \\ 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7. . . \\ 1 & 3 & 6 & 10 & 15 & 21 & 28. . . \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & . . . \end{array} \right][/tex]
So you will have:
[tex]C = a_{\delta p} + a_{1p} + a_{2p} + a_{3p} + ... + a_{\delta p}[/tex]
[tex]= a_{37} + a_{17} + a_{27} + a_{37} = 28 + 28 + 7 + 1 = 64.[/tex]
So there are 64 different ways to randomly choose 7 people, in which in every 2 selected people, they don't sit next to each other.
You can try another number of people sitting on the table (n), and the number of selected people (p).
You can use this as a method to check your answer.
Viet Dao,
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K