What Is the Interval of Definition for This Differential Equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the interval of definition for the differential equation y' = (3x²) / (3y² - 4) with the initial condition y(1) = 0. Participants are exploring the implications of singularities in the equation and how they affect the values of x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the singularity at |y| = 2√3/3 and how it relates to the values of x. There are attempts to derive conditions for x based on this singularity, with some questioning the calculations leading to different denominators in their results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some have offered guidance on the nature of the singularity and its implications for the interval of definition, while others are still grappling with the calculations and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific values that y cannot take, which influence the calculations for x. Participants are also discussing the need for clarity in their mathematical expressions and the potential for different interpretations of the problem.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
I have the following problem:

[tex]y'=\frac{3x^{2}}{3y^{2}-4};\quad y(1)=0[/tex]

I solved this, and came up with [itex]y^{3}-4y-x^{3}=-1[/itex]

My problem lies in finding the interval of definition. From the original DE, it is clear that [itex]|y|\neq \frac{2\sqrt{3}}{3}[/itex]. Then, after plugging that in for y and solving for what x can't be, I come up with:

[tex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|\neq \frac{16\sqrt{3}}{9}[/tex]

...however, my reasoning doesn't seem to work here. Apparently, the answer is:

[tex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|<\frac{16\sqrt{3}}{3}[/tex]

Can someone help me out here?

Thanks a lot. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the y-value can't be allowed to slide past the point of singularity when starting on 1, can it?
 
Alright, well that explains why it is less-than, but why is the denominator 3 instead of 9? Each time I work it out, I come up with 9 in the denominator.
 
Well, show your work! :smile:
 
[tex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|=y\left(y^{2}-4\right)[/tex]

I then plug in [itex]y=\frac{2\sqrt{3}}{3}[/itex] (which is one of the values y cannot be) to see what value(s) of x would give this:

[tex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|\neq\frac{2\sqrt{3}}{3}\left(\frac{4}{3}-4\right)[/tex]

..and upon solving for this particular value, I come up with [itex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|\neq\frac{16\sqrt{3}}{9}[/itex], which is incorrect. Why is this?

Thanks again.
 
apmcavoy said:
[tex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|=y\left(y^{2}-4\right)[/tex]

I then plug in [itex]y=\frac{2\sqrt{3}}{3}[/itex] (which is one of the values y cannot be) to see what value(s) of x would give this:

[tex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|\neq\frac{2\sqrt{3}}{3}\left(\frac{4}{3}-4\right)[/tex]

..and upon solving for this particular value, I come up with [itex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|\neq\frac{16\sqrt{3}}{9}[/itex], which is incorrect. Why is this?

Thanks again.

[tex]\frac{16}{3\sqrt{3}}[/tex]

is correct. Can you generate an implicit plot of the solution? I've attached one. Do you understand why it looks like that and why the ENTIRE plot satisfies the differential equation even at the points of vertical tangency? I included the two vertical lines to show where the values of x are that you calculated.
 

Attachments

  • odeplot1.JPG
    odeplot1.JPG
    3.5 KB · Views: 428
Well, I presume you meant to say:

[tex]\left|x^{3}-1\right|=\left|y\left(y^{2}-4\right)\right|[/tex]

Anyways, here's a problem:

You know that y cannot be equal to ±2√3/3.

However, that does not mean that y(y²-4) cannot be equal to

(2√3/3)((2√3/3)²-4)
 
Last edited:
Ok that makes sense. Thank you everyone for your help. By the way, which program did you use to generate that plot? I use Linux and can't find anything that is relatively inexpensive or free for graphing.

Thanks again.
 
apmcavoy said:
Ok that makes sense. Thank you everyone for your help. By the way, which program did you use to generate that plot? I use Linux and can't find anything that is relatively inexpensive or free for graphing.

Thanks again.

I used Mathematica but I'm sure others would do. I tell you what, suppose you just absolutely had to write from scratch in C++, a program to plot it. You could do that right? Just for each value of x in the domain, solve the cubic polynomial for y, get the (real) roots, put them all together, and there you go. :smile:
 
  • #10
Bleh, if I had remembered it was a point of tangency, I could have found the other value of y much more easily when x³-1 = 16√3/9. :frown: (Oh well, at least I only had to solve a quadratic!)
 
  • #11
saltydog said:
I used Mathematica but I'm sure others would do. I tell you what, suppose you just absolutely had to write from scratch in C++, a program to plot it. You could do that right? Just for each value of x in the domain, solve the cubic polynomial for y, get the (real) roots, put them all together, and there you go. :smile:

Just for the record: It's easier to solve for x in terms of y (at least to get the plot). Just for each value of y in some range, compute:

[tex]x=\sqrt[3]{1+y^3-4y}[/tex]

Ok, I'm done.
 
  • #12
Thank you so much for all the help! I appreciate that graph. Now I can see why it wouldn't be a function if the range contained anything else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K