How to Manipulate Lim Sups and Lim Infs in Proofs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmurphy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the manipulation of limit superior (lim sup) and limit inferior (lim inf) in mathematical proofs, specifically regarding bounded sequences. Colleen seeks guidance on proving that lim sup(sn + tn) is less than or equal to lim sup sn + lim sup tn, and similarly for the product of sequences. The key takeaway is the application of the definition of lim sup, which states that lim sup sn = lim N -> infinity sup{sn: n > N}, to derive inequalities involving sums and products of bounded sequences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limit superior (lim sup) and limit inferior (lim inf) definitions.
  • Familiarity with bounded sequences in mathematical analysis.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs and inequalities.
  • Concept of supremum in the context of sequences.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of limit superior and limit inferior in detail.
  • Learn how to apply the definition of lim sup in various proof scenarios.
  • Explore examples of inequalities involving lim sup and lim inf for bounded sequences.
  • Investigate the relationship between lim sup and lim inf in the context of convergence.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers focusing on real analysis, particularly those dealing with sequences and series in proofs.

cmurphy
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have several questions regarding lim sups and lim infs. I have a couple of proofs that I need to do, and I'm not sure where to start, because I don't have a good understanding of how to "play" with the definition; lim sup sn = lim N -> infinity sup{sn: n > N}.

Any suggestions?

An example of a problem I'm struggling with is:

Show that lim sup(sn + tn) is less than or equal to lim sup sn + lim sup tn for bounded sequences (sn) and (tn).

Similarly, how could I show that lim sup(sntn) is less than or equal to (lim sup sn)(lim sup tn), where (sn) and (tn) are bounded sequences of nonnegative integers?

Thanks in advance,
Colleen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For any e, there is an N so that sn<=e+limsupsn and tn<=e+limsuptn, for all n>=N. Therefore sn+tn<=limsupsn+limsuptn+2e for all n>=N. I'm sure you can finish it. The same trick can be used for the product limsup.
 
I understand what you've done, but I don't actually see how to proceed. Since
sn + tn - 2e <= lim sup sn + lim sup tn, how do you get lim sup (sn + tn)? I think this might go back to the problem that I'm having with understanding how to manipulate lim sup. Conceptually, I understand what it means, but in terms of manipulating this for a proof, I get lost.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K