Fetal Heart Wall Velocity from Ultrasound Reflection

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the measurement of fetal heart wall velocity using ultrasound reflection. The context includes the frequency of the sound wave, the speed of sound in body tissue, and the detection of beats per second.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations related to the frequency of the reflected sound and its relation to the speed of sound in tissue. There are questions about the correctness of the procedure and the interpretation of results.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring different interpretations of the calculations, while others are questioning the accuracy of the original approach. There is a sense of seeking clarification and alternative ideas without a clear consensus on the correct method.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a potential error in the calculations, and participants are encouraged to share additional ideas or approaches. The original poster's calculations and assumptions are under scrutiny.

squib
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
A sound wave travels at a frequency 2.25 MHz through a pregnant woman's abdomen and is reflected from the fetal heart wall of her unborn baby. The heart wall is moving toward the sound receiver as the heart beats. The reflected sound is then mixed with the transmitted sound, and 87.0 beats per second are detected. The speed of sound in body tissue is 1510 m/s.

I did 87 = x - 2,250,000
F = 2,250,087

so then 2,250,087 = 2,250,000 (1510 + V_heart)/150
which came to .0584 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you divided by 1510 m/s, right?
Did you have a question about this procedure,
or a comment, or are you just bragging? (;>
 
so then 2,250,087 = 2,250,000 (1510 + V_heart)/1510
which came to .0584 m/s


My answer wasn't right =/
 
so then 2,250,087 = 2,250,000 (1510 + V_heart)/1510
which came to .0584 m/s


My answer wasn't right =/
 
anyone else have any ideas?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
8K