|
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no, scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>"Charlie Stromeyer Jr." <cstromey@hotmail.com> wrote:\n\n> At the end of the paper, "Rotating Superconductors: Ginzburg-Landau\n> Equations", the author suspects that if higher order corrections were\n> considered for his model then there might be a way to reconcile the\n> Tate experiments and theory, but I do not know if the author has even\n> since tried doing these modifications himself.\n\nHere is the reference for this paper:\n\n[4] H. Capellmann, Eur Phys Jrnl B, 25, pp. 25-30 (2002).\n\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>"Charlie Stromeyer Jr." <cstromey@hotmail.com> wrote:
> At the end of the paper, "Rotating Superconductors: Ginzburg-Landau
> Equations", the author suspects that if higher order corrections were
> considered for his model then there might be a way to reconcile the
> Tate experiments and theory, but I do not know if the author has even
> since tried doing these modifications himself.
Here is the reference for this paper:
[4] H. Capellmann, Eur Phys Jrnl B, 25, pp[itex]. 25-30[/itex] (2002).
|