View Single Post
 My open hearted post: If we look at Drake's equation http://www.setileague.org/general/drake.htm we can find parameter L. L = The "lifetime" of communicating civilizations, or in other worlds, if there is no natural catastrophe in some given planet, then how some civilization survives the power of its technology? If we look on our civilization, I think that we cannot ignore L and in this case we should ask every day "how we survive the power of our technology?" My work for the last 20 years is one of many possible ways to answer this every day question. Though my research I have found that if some civilization has no balance between its morality level and its technological level, then there is a very high probability that its L= some n , or in other words it is no longer exists. Now, let us look at our L and let us ask ourselves: "Do we do all what we have to do to avoid some n?" Most of the power of our technology is based on the Language of Mathematics and its reasoning, where the current reasoning is generally based on 0_XOR_1 logical reasoning, and there is nothing in this reasoning which researches the most important question which is: "How do we use this powerful Language on order to find the balance between our morality level and our technological level"? If our answer is: "The Language of Mathematics has nothing to do with these kinds of questions", then in my opinion we quickly bring ourselves to find the exact n of our L. In my opinion, in order to avoid the final n of our L, we have no choice but to find the balance between our morality level and our technological level within the framework of what is called the Language of Mathematics. Furthermore, we should not leave this question to be answered beyond the framework of our scientific methods, because no other framework, accept our scientific method can really determinate the destiny of our L. As I see it, the internet is The place to participate other people in such thoughts.