<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no, scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:33:30 +0000 (UTC), "Hontas F. Farmer III"\n<hfarmer@alumni.niu.edu> wrote:\n\n[Snip...]\n\n> Theories of gravitation and finely structured space time are\n> NOT theories of Ether. They are theories which say that empty\n> space has structure. Basically they all rest on the notion\n> that space is not infinitely divisible and that their is a\n> fundamental quantum of space time measurement. This is not the\n> same as Ether theory.\n\nWhat, specifically, is/are the difference(s)?\n\nPaul Stowe pstoweblue@ix.netcom.com\n\nremove the color for valid return e-mail address\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:33:30 [itex]+0000[/itex] (UTC), "Hontas F. Farmer III"
<hfarmer@alumni.niu.edu> wrote:
[Snip...]
> Theories of gravitation and finely structured space time are
> NOT theories of Ether. They are theories which say that empty
> space has structure. Basically they all rest on the notion
> that space is not infinitely divisible and that their is a
> fundamental quantum of space time measurement. This is not the
> same as Ether theory.
What, specifically, [itex]is/are[/itex] the difference(s)?
Paul Stowe
pstoweblue@ix.netcom.com
remove the color for valid return e-mail address