Thread: No new Einstein
View Single Post
Jul12-05, 11:52 PM   #26
 
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no, scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>LEJ Brouwer wrote:\n&gt; More specifically Einstein believed:\n&gt; (c) That there exists a classical field theory unifying gravity,\n&gt; electrodynamics and quantum theory.\n&gt;\n&gt; Anyone who poo-poos any of the above beliefs/visions of Einstein is\n&gt; simply not of Einstein\'s calibre, and can neither hope to be, nor is\n&gt; worthy of being, the next Einstein.\n\n"One can give good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by\na continuous field. From the quantum phenomenon it appears to follow\nwith certainty that a finite system of finite energy can be completely\ndescribed in terms of a finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This\ndoes not seem to be in accordance with a continuum theory, and must\nlead to an attempt to find a purely algebraic theory for the\ndescription of reality. But nobody knows how to find the basis for\nsuch a theory"\n\n-- Albert Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity, 1956 (posthumous)\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">&nbsp;&nbsp;View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>LEJ Brouwer wrote:
> More specifically Einstein believed:
> (c) That there exists a classical field theory unifying gravity,
> electrodynamics and quantum theory.
>
> Anyone who poo-poos any of the above beliefs/visions of Einstein is
> simply not of Einstein's calibre, and can neither hope to be, nor is
> worthy of being, the next Einstein.


"One can give good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by
a continuous field. From the quantum phenomenon it appears to follow
with certainty that a finite system of finite energy can be completely
described in terms of a finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This
does not seem to be in accordance with a continuum theory, and must
lead to an attempt to find a purely algebraic theory for the
description of reality. But nobody knows how to find the basis for
such a theory"

-- Albert Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity, 1956 (posthumous)