Register to reply

Ln x dx

by PrudensOptimus
Tags: None
Share this thread:
Jan4-04, 05:41 PM
P: 640
Integrat Ln[x]dx!!!!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Jan4-04, 05:47 PM
P: 333
Consider it as 1*ln(x) and use parts.
Jan4-04, 10:06 PM
P: 45
If you don't feel like doing it, you can always use:

The Integrator

It gives the answer:

-x + x \ln x

Jan5-04, 04:22 AM
himanshu121's Avatar
P: 658
Ln x dx

Is [x] greatest integer function??
Jan5-04, 09:19 AM
P: 333
Hmm, didn't consider that. I'm not sure there'd be a closed form expression for [itex]\int ln[x] dx [/itex]
where [itex][x][/itex] is the next greatest integer function. It'd be easy enough to get a numerical answer if the interval was specified though.
Jan5-04, 10:24 AM
P: 22
You could break the integral into a summation. [x] is constant between intervals of integers, so you end up with a sum of trivial integrals.

I think this is what Lonewolf is proposing (please excuse my ignorance!)


Register to reply