| Thread Closed |
Ln x dx |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jan4-04, 05:41 PM | #1 |
|
|
Ln x dx
Integrat Ln[x]dx!!!!
|
| PhysOrg.com |
science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis >> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt >> Galaxy's Ring of Fire |
| Jan4-04, 05:47 PM | #2 |
|
|
Consider it as 1*ln(x) and use parts.
|
| Jan4-04, 10:06 PM | #3 |
|
|
If you don't feel like doing it, you can always use:
The Integrator It gives the answer: [tex] -x + x \ln x [/tex] |
| Jan5-04, 04:22 AM | #4 |
|
|
Ln x dx
Is [x] greatest integer function??
|
| Jan5-04, 09:19 AM | #5 |
|
|
Hmm, didn't consider that. I'm not sure there'd be a closed form expression for [itex]\int ln[x] dx [/itex]
where [itex][x][/itex] is the next greatest integer function. It'd be easy enough to get a numerical answer if the interval was specified though. |
| Jan5-04, 10:24 AM | #6 |
|
|
You could break the integral into a summation. [x] is constant between intervals of integers, so you end up with a sum of trivial integrals.
I think this is what Lonewolf is proposing (please excuse my ignorance!) Regards, Sam |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |