Multiplication=addition 2*2=2+2=4

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical relationship between multiplication and addition, specifically exploring pairs of numbers where the result of their multiplication equals the result of their addition. Participants are investigating whether the number of such pairs is finite or infinite within the real numbers, with a particular focus on integer solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant wonders if research exists on the pairs of numbers where multiplication equals addition, providing examples like 2*2=2+2 and 3*1.5=4.5.
  • Another participant presents the equation xy = x + y and rearranges it to (x-1)(y-1) = 1, suggesting that in natural numbers, the only solution is x = y = 2.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that for any real x (except x = 1), there exists a corresponding y such that x + y = xy, indicating an infinite number of pairs in the reals.
  • One participant expresses confusion about proving the integer solutions and seeks clarification on the notation used for integers.
  • Another participant clarifies that for x/(x-1) to be an integer, x-1 must divide x, leading to the conclusion that the only integer solutions are x = y = 2 and x = y = 0.
  • There is a correction regarding the notation for integers, with a participant emphasizing the distinction between natural numbers and integers.
  • Several participants engage in clarifying misunderstandings and correcting each other's statements without reaching a consensus on the broader implications of their findings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the integer solutions being limited to x = y = 2 and x = y = 0, but there is disagreement regarding the existence of infinite pairs in the real numbers and the interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the implications of their findings for real numbers versus integers, and there are varying interpretations of the notation and definitions used in the discussion.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
i think everyone is familiar to this but i wonder if someone has made his research to study it.
what i mean is the namubers that when the result of multiplying them together is the same as adding them:
for example:
2*2=2+2=4 (trivial, i know (-: ).
3*1.5=3+1.5=4.5

my question has someone prooved that the number of these pairs are finite or infinite in the real numbers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xy=x+y

rearrange and solve for R.

for N (well, this is the number theory thread)

xy-x-y+1=1

(x-1)(y-1)=1

in N x=y=2
 
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something... You want real solutions to this equation:

x + y = xy
=>
y = x / (x - 1)

I.e, for any x != 1 we can chose a y so that x + y = xy, namely y = x / (x - 1). Any real x (except for x = 1) will give a real y, so there are an infinite number of such pairs...

A more interesting question would be to consider only integers...
 
Originally posted by Muzza
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something... You want real solutions to this equation:

x + y = xy
=>
y = x / (x - 1)

I.e, for any x != 1 we can chose a y so that x + y = xy, namely y = x / (x - 1). Any real x (except for x = 1) will give a real y, so there are an infinite number of such pairs...

A more interesting question would be to consider only integers...
i didnt think about it very much so perhaps from this had risen the misunderstanding.
i guess in the real numbers is really trivial.
so let's say just prooving for integers how do you go around prooving this?
[x,y]=[Z] or [x,x/(x-1)]=[Z]
 
so let's say just prooving for integers how do you go around prooving this?
[x,y]=[Z] or [x,x/(x-1)]=[Z]

I have no idea what this means. matt grime provided an answer for what happens if you only consider the natural numbers (i.e, x = y = 2 is the only solution).
 
Last edited:
z doesn't represent the integers?
 
Aha, yes it does, but you used the equals sign (and non-curly braces), and I've never seen = used to specify membership in a set (
img1.png
seems to be more commonly used).
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
i didnt think about it very much so perhaps from this had risen the misunderstanding.
i guess in the real numbers is really trivial.
so let's say just prooving for integers how do you go around prooving this?
[x,y]=[Z] or [x,x/(x-1)]=[Z]

For [tex]\frac{x}{x-1}[/tex] to be an integer, [tex]x-1[/tex] must divide[tex]x[/tex]. Since the difference between the two is 1, their greatest common factor is 1, so the only solutions are [tex]x-1=1[/tex] and [tex]x-1=-1[/tex] (2+2=2*2 and 0+0=0*0).
 
NateG, you should state you are only working in N there, by saying integer you implying Z. In Z, there are other answers. All we know is that here (x-1) is a unit, hence x-1=-1 or 1, yielding the other integer answer of x=y=0 as well as x=y=2
 
  • #10
For [tex]\frac{x}{x-1}[/tex] to be an integer |x-1| must divide |x|. The GCF of the two absolute values is 1 (by Euclid's algorithm). Therefore [tex]|x-1| \leq 1[/tex] since it divides |x| and obviously divides itself. For [tex]x \in \mathbb{Z}[/tex] that leaves three solutions: 0,1, and 2, but 1 leads to division by zero, so the only solutions are x=0 and x=2.

P.S. My apologies for the mixed formatting
 
Last edited:
  • #11
forget that last post if you saw it, i absolutely apoligize, i misread your post.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Originally posted by matt grime
forget that last post if you saw it, i absolutely apoligize, i misread your post.

Don't sweat it, I've posted some beauties myself. I should be less adverserial in my response though. ;)
 
  • #13
Integer solutions of [tex]xy = x + y[/tex] where [tex]x,y \epsilon Z[/tex]

[tex]xy - x - y = 0[/tex]

[tex](x-1)(y-1) = 1[/tex]

let [tex]x' = x -1[/tex] and [tex]y' = y - 1[/tex] so [tex]x',y' \epsilon Z[/tex]

So [tex]x' = 1 / y'[/tex]

The only integers whose reciprocals are also integers are 1 and -1

So [tex]y' = 1[/tex] and [tex]x' = 1[/tex]

So [tex]y = 2[/tex] and [tex]x = 2[/tex]

AND

So [tex]y' = -1[/tex] and [tex]x' = -1[/tex]

So [tex]y = 0[/tex] and [tex]x = 0[/tex]

Therefore there are only two solutions to this diophantine equation [tex]x = y = 2[/tex] and [tex]x = y = 0[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K