Register to reply

Is the Euler-Mclaurin sum formula valid for distributions ?

Share this thread:
mhill
#1
Feb2-08, 05:16 AM
P: 193
If we take the Euler MacLaurin sum formula

[tex] \int_{a}^{b} dxf(x) - \sum_{n=a} ^{b}f(n)= (1/2)(f(b)+f(a))+ \sum_{r}B_{2r}(2n!)^{-1}D^{2r-1}(f(b)-f(a)) [/tex]

However let's suppose that f(x) or the first , third , ... derivative is just for example a Dirac delta distribution or [tex] D^{k}\delta (x-c) [/tex]

We could use distribution theory to justify the derivative of a Dirac delta, so the Euler Mac Laurin sum formula would yied to distribution instead of real valued function but i am not sure.

to put an example, let suppose that f(x) is proportional to the floor function [tex] floor|x^2 + 3| [/tex] so its first derivative is just a Dirac delta.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Scientists develop 'electronic nose' for rapid detection of C. diff infection
Why plants in the office make us more productive
Tesla Motors dealing as states play factory poker

Register to reply

Related Discussions
The Cramer-Euler-McLaurin Paradox General Math 12
Euler-Mc laurin sum formula wit dilation. Calculus 0
Results same w/ Euler, Improved Euler, & Runge-Kutta Differential Equations 14
Abel sum formula..when is valid?.. Calculus 0
Is this a valid limit? General Math 9